Re: [Mailman-Developers] gate_news still broken in 2.1b..
At 03:03 PM 2/26/02 -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
"RJ" == Ron Jarrell <jarrell@vt.edu> writes:
RJ> Yea, you know, I sat down last night when I got home and RJ> looked at the code, and slapped myself on the forehead with RJ> the same realization, that I was blaming the wrong piece of RJ> code...
RJ> As for the patch - BING! We have a winner.
Awesome. Thanks, I'm going to commit this change.
Cool.. How much more you going to do before the formal beta release? Enough seems to be working (and I have enough of a handle on things I might have to handwave) that I'm tempted to start putting it up on my production box... But if there's going to be a last minute flurry of features and fixes before then, I probably won't bother.
Oh, BTW, simple typo in the admin pages. In the VARHELP=topics/topics_enabled, the sentence: "The body of the message can also be optionally scanned for Subject: and Keyword: headers" Keyword: should be "Keywords:", which bit me for a while, because, of course, *that* was the occurrence of the word (which is right two other places in the paragraph) that I focused on.
Although, I'm thinking, either Keyword: or Keywords: out to to work.
Especically since it'll usually be one keyword...
"RJ" == Ron Jarrell <jarrell@vt.edu> writes:
RJ> Oh, BTW, simple typo in the admin pages. In the
RJ> VARHELP=topics/topics_enabled, the sentence: "The body of the
RJ> message can also be optionally scanned for Subject: and
RJ> Keyword: headers" Keyword: should be "Keywords:", which bit me
RJ> for a while, because, of course, *that* was the occurrence of
RJ> the word (which is right two other places in the paragraph)
RJ> that I focused on.
RJ> Although, I'm thinking, either Keyword: or Keywords: out to to
RJ> work. Especically since it'll usually be one keyword...Naw, Keywords: is standard and I don't think we need to support them both.
I've fixed the typo. Thanks, -Barry
participants (2)
-
barry＠zope.com -
Ron Jarrell