Re: [Mailman-Developers] ASCII Prefixes
"BG" == Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org> writes:
>> Here's a tricky issue, one with a high rabbit hole probability
>> (which I'd like to avoid if possible ;). OTOH, we could use a
>> simple heuristic to try to keep the prefix unencoded in the
>> common case: if the prefix contains only ascii characters, we
>> could choose to leave it in the default us-ascii (or really the
>> None) encoding. If it contains non-ascii characters, we'd have
>> no choice but to encode it.
BG> OTOOH, we could make *this* the per-list setting; we could
BG> have the heuristic guess whether to encode or not if the list
BG> owner wants it. That way we don't have to have a ton of prefix
BG> character set settings, and we make the people who get angry
BG> at seeing [MyFrenchList] encoded in header QP happy.
Is subject_prefix the only place this option would make sense? If so, then I can probably add a boolean variable to the General admin page, otherwise I might want to add something to the Languages page.
BG> Sorry for being absent recently, I'm finally at a job that's
BG> challenging enough to make my brain not want to do coding at
BG> home. :)
That's good (I think ;). Welcome back, and I hope you'll stick around!
-Barry
On Tuesday, July 23, 2002, at 09:36 , Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
BG> OTOOH, we could make *this* the per-list setting; we could BG> have the heuristic guess whether to encode or not if the list BG> owner wants it. That way we don't have to have a ton of prefix BG> character set settings, and we make the people who get angry BG> at seeing [MyFrenchList] encoded in header QP happy.
Is subject_prefix the only place this option would make sense? If so, then I can probably add a boolean variable to the General admin page, otherwise I might want to add something to the Languages page.
The only other place I could guess would be the message headers and footers. But bodies are so commonly encoded in quoted-printable these days that it's pretty much not an issue. I'll guess the only reason people have an issue with headers having encoded-words that don't "need to" be encoded is because there are a few people out there who don't have RFC-compliant mail readers.
Ben
participants (2)
-
barry@zope.com
-
Ben Gertzfield