Hello I'm writing this email to notify one major change in the implementation which I learned last weekend, as Steve mentioned earlier, it would be pretty hard for users to type in bulky Subjects/Tos in the message which is a primary need for me to assess messages as dlist messages or not with a follow up thread info to be extracted. To get rid of that I used the thread id (which is generated for a particular thread depending upon the newness of the thread) and wrapped it around with list name and web host and added that to Reply-To so that a user can easily choose that option and the bulky content is autogenerated. However while coming up with this solution I missed an important detail i.e. how the lmtp runner would respond to such a 'To'. So I modified the split_recipient method in lmtp after discussing few things with barry and currently I can accept listaname+HASH-request@domain, where HASH is my thread id which is typically a sha1 hexdigest and the request part is as before. Later I will be adding tests to check the HASH part with relevant test cases. So sending a pull request will take a little longer than expected since I need to re do my rules with some other changes. Although its a little bump and will not hinder my work for long, I think its a crucial one too and needs your attention before going ahead. Please feel free to reply when ever you find time.

I understand that its not easy to workout or check things which are working and which aren't since there is no documentation yet, I request you to be patient and spend a little time with my shell logs from previous blog posts, I have made it similar to the mailman documentation and anybody who had earlier gone through the documentation can easily catch up.

I also take this opportunity to thank Stephen, Terri, Florian, Barry & Abhilash for being a constant support as I cleared the mid term evaluation recently. I am looking forward for some code reviews soon!