Re: [Mailman-Developers] [Mailman-Users] Sender field
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5704d/5704dcb6dfb1e4d374e0cfcd177b80a59c7087d4" alt=""
April 28, 2006
6:23 p.m.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12379/12379ce99f5ac7f4b44fb18b20673926b1893b84" alt=""
April 2006
10:23 p.m.
New subject: [Mailman-Users] Sender field
At 2:23 PM -0400 2006-04-28, Bob Puff@NLE wrote:
No, in this case Neal appears to be correct -- SPF only deals
with the envelope sender, as used in "MAIL FROM", and the "Sender:" header field is not used.
However, DKIM would be a serious problem for us.
-- Brad Knowles, <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
LOPSA member since December 2005. See <http://www.lopsa.org/>.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12379/12379ce99f5ac7f4b44fb18b20673926b1893b84" alt=""
April 2006
10:23 p.m.
New subject: [Mailman-Users] Sender field
At 2:23 PM -0400 2006-04-28, Bob Puff@NLE wrote:
No, in this case Neal appears to be correct -- SPF only deals
with the envelope sender, as used in "MAIL FROM", and the "Sender:" header field is not used.
However, DKIM would be a serious problem for us.
-- Brad Knowles, <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
LOPSA member since December 2005. See <http://www.lopsa.org/>.
6877
Age (days ago)
6877
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Bob Puff@NLE
-
Brad Knowles