Bugs item #652001, was opened at 2002-12-11 07:43 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=652001&group_id=103

Category: mail delivery Group: 2.1 beta

Status: Closed Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Gibbs (midrangeman) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Reply-to munging not using correct host

Initial Comment: Mailman 5.1b6 is not using the lists configured host name for the reply_to address ... it is using the default host name instead.

I have mailman configured for virtual hosting ... the two hosts registered are 'midrange.com' and 'lists.fallingrock.net'.

Default.py has the standard: add_virtualhost(DEFAULT_URL_HOST, DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST)

and I've added the following to mm_cfg.py: VIRTUAL_HOST_OVERVIEW = 1 add_virtualhost('lists.fallingrock.net', 'lists.fallingrock.net')

My test list is configured with: host_name = 'lists.fallingrock.net' first_strip_reply_to = 1 reply_goes_to_list = 1 reply_to_address = ''

When I post a message to my test list, the reply-to header reflects my DEFAULT host name instead of the list's host name...

Return-Path: <beta-testers- bounces@lists.fallingrock.net> Received: from linux.midrange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by linux.midrange.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gB8FtTa02925; Sun, 8 Dec 2002 09:55:29 -0600 Received: from GRYFFINDOR.midrange.com (gryffindor.midrange.com [192.168.1.100]) by linux.midrange.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gB8FtLi02900 for <beta-testers@lists.fallingrock.net>; Sun, 8 Dec 2002 09:55:21 -0600 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20021208095147.02ccf150@linux.midrange.c om> X-Sender: david@linux.midrange.com (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 09:55:17 -0600 To: beta-testers@lists.fallingrock.net From: David Gibbs <david@midrange.com> Subject: Re: [beta-testers] Up for another round? In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20021208094537.02c70330@linux.midrange.c om> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BeenThere: beta-testers@lists.fallingrock.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list Reply-To: New Feature Beta Testers <beta- testers@midrange.com> List-Id: New Feature Beta Testers <beta- testers.lists.fallingrock.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.fallingrock.net/mailman2/listinfo/beta- testers>,

<mailto:beta-testers-request@lists.fallingrock.net? subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.fallingrock.net/mailman2/private/beta- testers> List-Post: <mailto:beta-testers@lists.fallingrock.net> List-Help: <mailto:beta-testers- request@lists.fallingrock.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.fallingrock.net/mailman2/listinfo/beta- testers>, <mailto:beta-testers- request@lists.fallingrock.net?subject=subscribe> Sender: beta-testers-bounces@midrange.com Errors-To: beta-testers-bounces@midrange.com

Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-23 23:40

Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800

I still cannot reproduce this. When I turn the reply-to options on I get the expected virtual host, regardless of whether the host was my primary or secondary host.

Without the patch, I'm going to have to close this as irreproducible.

You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=652001&group_id=103