Minor flaw in archive date handling
Hi folks,
I had some trouble getting the stackless mailing list repaired, after one message was repeated thousands of times. This was a message from October, but interestingly, the thousands of messages appeared in both the October and the November archives.
Looking forther at one instance of the thousands of copies, I recognized that the message had no "Date:" entry, just a Resent-Date, for some unknown reason.
After clearing the whole pipermail archive and recreating it with the bin/arch command, the message again appeared in the November archive. I took one of the fields with valid date enties and added it as "Date:" field by hand. Then the archiving worked as expected.
My question: When a message happens to have no date, messages appear to be archived into the wrong archive file. There are a couple of other date fields available, like the usual "from" - line on top of the message, fields like Resent-Date or dates from the message passing through other servers.
Wouldn't it make sense to do a more exhaustive search for a proper date, instead of accepting a missing date?
cheers - chris
-- Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer@tismer.com> Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's Kaunstr. 26 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net 14163 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net PGP Fingerprint E182 71C7 1A9D 66E9 9D15 D3CC D4D7 93E2 1FAE F6DF where do you want to jump today? http://www.stackless.com
Christian Tismer wrote:
I wrote:
My question: When a message happens to have no date, messages appear to be archived into the wrong archive file. There are a couple of other date fields available, like the usual "from" - line on top of the message, fields like Resent-Date or dates from the message passing through other servers.
Wouldn't it make sense to do a more exhaustive search for a proper date, instead of accepting a missing date?
Changing the message from "one-should-do-such-and-such" style to "I-would-do-a-patch,-just-tell-me-how" style:
I'm asking if such a change makes sense, and where to do the adjustment: In the process where the messages are collected in the .mbox file (Mailman change), or later, when the archives are generated (pipermail-change) ?
regards - chris
-- Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer@tismer.com> Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's Kaunstr. 26 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net 14163 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net PGP Fingerprint E182 71C7 1A9D 66E9 9D15 D3CC D4D7 93E2 1FAE F6DF where do you want to jump today? http://www.stackless.com
participants (1)
-
Christian Tismer