Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: To VERP or not to VERP?
On Sun, 17 Jun 2001 12:57:20 -0400 Jay R Ashworth <jra@baylink.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 09:53:28AM -0700, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
But what I've found, for really large e-mail installations, there's always another bottleneck. The bigger/faster machine paradigm just doesn't scale after a while, so what I'm working on now is a new setup that I'm calling the "army of smurfs" design. I'm going to be buying lots of small/fast/cheap boxes, and not going to try to try to keep making that single monolithic machine do incrementally more.
If you're talking about generic large mail farms, Chuq, you *really* need to go find the Earthlink white paper on that and read it, if you haven't already. They have one on news, too. Don't recall the URL; Ask The Web<tm>.
http://www.earthlink.net/about/papers/mailarch.html http://www.earthlink.net/about/papers/scalenews.html
-- J C Lawrence claw@kanga.nu ---------(*) http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ The pressure to survive and rhetoric may make strange bedfellows
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 09:48:52AM -0700, J C Lawrence wrote:
If you're talking about generic large mail farms, Chuq, you *really* need to go find the Earthlink white paper on that and read it, if you haven't already. They have one on news, too. Don't recall the URL; Ask The Web<tm>.
http://www.earthlink.net/about/papers/mailarch.html http://www.earthlink.net/about/papers/scalenews.html
Them was the ones; thanks, Joe.
Cheers, -- jra
Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com Member of the Technical Staff Baylink The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think Tampa Bay, Florida http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 804 5015
OS X: Because making Unix user-friendly was easier than debugging Windows
participants (2)
-
J C Lawrence
-
Jay R. Ashworth