Re: [Mailman-Developers] [Mailman-checkins] Proposed merge of Small Fixes into Stable, maintained release series updated
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Jun 9, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
The proposal to merge Small Fixes into Stable, maintained release
series has been updated.Status: Work in progress => Merged
Mark, I'm curious. Are you looking for review of the merge proposals,
or adding them for the record keeping? I'm wondering because I'm
happy to review any merge proposal you want (and would like to
experiment with this feature).
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBSE1igHEjvBPtnXfVAQL1NwP/S5VVvStK+SC34f+Khqec782Kav6u0Hnp EtH/9XfgLxS/xfCIk5CsaSK+DvbXz3TJLHRZv3oQg7xAbI/rohWF5MuriANaDgYQ PBEc8tBooYjWMZcyvIWPYqSA2hF6/blaRIyb1RUxXStIN67w8DDVyM3twAAxvf1a ENfTaRVfDWA= =rC84 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Barry Warsaw wrote: | On Jun 9, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: | |> The proposal to merge Small Fixes into Stable, maintained release |> series has been updated. | |> Status: Work in progress => Merged | | Mark, I'm curious. Are you looking for review of the merge proposals, | or adding them for the record keeping? I'm wondering because I'm happy | to review any merge proposal you want (and would like to experiment with | this feature).
In the case of Andrew's Small Fixes branch, at least so far, I just want to mark them as merged for record keeping. It seems that in order to mark the branch as merged, there needs to be an open merge proposal first, so that's what I've been doing.
In other cases I would be looking for review although I haven't really given that much thought before now.
I guess one can tell that if I mark the proposal as merged within minutes of proposing it, it was for the record only ;-)
Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFITWgUVVuXXpU7hpMRAtH9AKCUtW9Xga8JHnvv76sB0oNhNFDKzACfR/4q 5hT4wfEg4ziT0oDDBBQ2Hlk= =gfaB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Jun 9, 2008, at 1:27 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
In the case of Andrew's Small Fixes branch, at least so far, I just
want to mark them as merged for record keeping. It seems that in order to mark the branch as merged, there needs to be an open merge proposal first, so that's what I've been doing.In other cases I would be looking for review although I haven't really given that much thought before now.
I guess one can tell that if I mark the proposal as merged within minutes of proposing it, it was for the record only ;-)
That's what I thought. :)
Sounds good. Eventually, I hope we get enough committers that we can
do mutual reviews and I plan on asking for reviews of my own code as
time goes on. For now, our team is small, and I look at every
revision that lands. I hope you'll do the same for the code I'm
committing!
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBSE1tXnEjvBPtnXfVAQK0hQP+KpMjLxjaR+g0sslJ0wpHQyjCMR1flvMM d5OvRuU35pqV3RGFVnCaCD7pZ4dG6SRo1yX0G8KtJW/OqE/KV1aPJkJwVkBI08bP bhU2ArvY4GB19ivi9xEzq7X6tPbYehbdbGsPyXLuPOT/3M+X8AzlMVSk5RV8XdQu GzW4UpfOk8I= =9a/l -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 01:04:00PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Mark, I'm curious. Are you looking for review of the merge proposals,
or adding them for the record keeping? I'm wondering because I'm
happy to review any merge proposal you want (and would like to
experiment with this feature).
To experiment with the feature, I've just submitted a merge request for the bounce-analysis branch (for MM2.2):
https://code.launchpad.net/~amk/mailman/bounce-analysis
Feel free to reject it (or whatever you do to merge proposals) as part of your experimenting. My feelings won't be hurt.
--amk
participants (3)
-
A.M. Kuchling
-
Barry Warsaw
-
Mark Sapiro