Re: [Mailman-Developers] traceback (still due to the BounceRunner)
March 30, 2002
3:20 p.m.
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 11:15:59 +0100 fil <fil@rezo.net> wrote:
Bounce processing really needs to be abstracted into a two pass process. Due to its current ad-hoc nature load and lookup expense for processing the membership roster is dominating the equation.
Suggest:
One pass does nothing but parse the incoming bounces for addresses and then adds them to a local/shared DB. An infrequently run cronjob (suggest no more than a couple times a day), then picks up this DB and handles the removals in a single fast locked process.
--
J C Lawrence
---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
claw@kanga.nu He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
8334
Age (days ago)
8334
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
J C Lawrence