Re: [Mailman-Developers] Boilerplate and content filtering [was: Introduction and Project Discussion]
Sreyanth writes:
Just hide the boilerplate in the email, giving a link to click. When clicked, use js to unhide the boilerplate. This would not anyhow require separate storage. Suggest me something if this is bad!
The main point of sharing links is not storage compression; it's that the link identifies boilerplate you've seen before by changing appearance. You won't be able to tell if JS is used.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen@xemacs.org>wrote:
Sreyanth writes:
Just hide the boilerplate in the email, giving a link to click. When clicked, use js to unhide the boilerplate. This would not anyhow require separate storage. Suggest me something if this is bad!
The main point of sharing links is not storage compression; it's that the link identifies boilerplate you've seen before by changing appearance. You won't be able to tell if JS is used.
I concur.
I I understood it before too. I proposed this JS approach, as I wondered why people would anyhow look at the boilerplate! (That's the main point of the project right!)
-- *Yours Sincerely* * * *Mora Sreyantha Chary* *Computer Engineering '14* *National Institute of Technology Karnataka* *Surathkal, India 575 025*
participants (2)
-
Sreyanth -
Stephen J. Turnbull