I got two problems and one feature request.
Fist, if I try to regenerate archive of a list with Current CVS mailman(using bin/arch), characters of the archives are currupted, unlike incoming mails. Can you give it a glance?
And, I've set "ARCHIVE_HTML_SANITIZER = 3" in my mm_cfg.py, but it doesn't work. Incoming mails are archived as if set with "ARCHIVE_HTML_SANITIZER = 1".
Why don't we have such a ARCHIVE_HTML_SANITIZER option that leaves html parts inline and doesn't html-escape. It can be really dangerous but, in a small reliable group, such an option can be quite useful. Nowadays there are many free webmail services which they send html mails only and archives become quite ugly.
-- | Jinhyok Heo (novembre @ ournature.org || http://ournature.org/~novembre/) |-------------------------------------------------------------------------- | "We are still reaching for the sky. In the developed countries people | are coming back down, saying, `It's empty up there.'" --- a Ladakhi monk
"JH" == Jinhyok Heo <novembre+dated+1039410247.6d79a7@ournature.org> writes:
JH> I got two problems and one feature request.
JH> Fist, if I try to regenerate archive of a list with Current
JH> CVS mailman(using bin/arch), characters of the archives are
JH> currupted, unlike incoming mails. Can you give it a glance?There may still be problems w/i18n in the archiver, but I'll need a lot more information than that to investigate your problem. Best would be a bug report on SF, with an uploaded sample message.
(I'm still catching up on list traffic.)
JH> And, I've set "ARCHIVE_HTML_SANITIZER = 3" in my mm_cfg.py,
JH> but it doesn't work. Incoming mails are archived as if set
JH> with "ARCHIVE_HTML_SANITIZER = 1".Did you run "mailmanctl restart"? Remember that any change to mm_cfg.py requires a restart for it to take effect. I just tried it and ARCHIVE_HTML_SANITIZER=3 works for me.
JH> Why don't we have such a ARCHIVE_HTML_SANITIZER option that
JH> leaves html parts inline and doesn't html-escape.There's a comment says that reminds me that it was difficult to code that option given the current architecture of Pipermail. Unfortunately, I don't remember the details.
-Barry
participants (2)
-
barry＠python.org -
Jinhyok Heo