Feature Request: Jerk Mode

I'm a 2.0.11 user. I did look through the NEWS file; apologies if I missed something new.
I'd like a subscription mode where someone will receive all messages, but when they post their message is only delivered back to them.
I run a few lists where we have trollers and trouble makers. Unsubscribing or moderating them doesn't help because they re-subscribe with a new email address. Moderation of subscriptions and posts is not practical on some lists.
These people just post to get a reaction out of other list members. The best solution is to have people ignore them, but that's hard on a list that is constantly changing. So, this mode would allow a way for the list owner to enforce people to ignore the posts.
I realize that it's not a perfect solution -- these people can still re-subscribe with a new email address, but for many they may not realize that they are the only one seeing their own messages.
Thanks,
-- Bill Moseley moseley@hank.org

At 9:36 AM -0700 2004/05/05, Bill Moseley wrote:
I run a few lists where we have trollers and trouble makers. Unsubscribing or moderating them doesn't help because they re-subscribe with a new email address. Moderation of subscriptions and posts is not practical on some lists.
Even if you required approval for the subscriptions, they'd still
find a way to get through. You have to moderate each and every post, at least for those subscribers who are causing problems.
These people just post to get a reaction out of other list members. The best solution is to have people ignore them, but that's hard on a list that is constantly changing. So, this mode would allow a way for the list owner to enforce people to ignore the posts.
They would notice that they're not getting a reaction and
re-subscribe under another name. You can't stop them.
I realize that it's not a perfect solution -- these people can still re-subscribe with a new email address, but for many they may not realize that they are the only one seeing their own messages.
Sooner or later, they will. I don't think that this is something
that you can solve. If you can't moderate the list, or at least moderate the problem users (and maybe moderate all new subscribers by default), and you can't get these people to behave, you're screwed.
-- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.

On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 07:18:51PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 9:36 AM -0700 2004/05/05, Bill Moseley wrote:
I run a few lists where we have trollers and trouble makers. Unsubscribing or moderating them doesn't help because they re-subscribe with a new email address. Moderation of subscriptions and posts is not practical on some lists.
Even if you required approval for the subscriptions, they'd still find a way to get through. You have to moderate each and every post, at least for those subscribers who are causing problems.
When I turned on moderation they resubscribed. So I'd need to moderate everyone. White listing would help on smaller lists, I suppose.
Both banning and moderation are obvious to the sender.
These people just post to get a reaction out of other list members. The best solution is to have people ignore them, but that's hard on a list that is constantly changing. So, this mode would allow a way for the list owner to enforce people to ignore the posts.
They would notice that they're not getting a reaction and re-subscribe under another name. You can't stop them.
I agree, that's true for some. It would slow the problem down in some cases, though. On one smaller list we managed to stop the behavior by asking everyone to not respond. So it does help in some cases.
No, not an answer. It would just be another tool. Like spam filtering -- it's nowhere perfect, but I still use filtering as it helps reduce the problem.
Thanks for the feedback, and thanks for Mailman!
-- Bill Moseley moseley@hank.org

On May 5, 2004, at 12:36 PM, Bill Moseley wrote:
I'd like a subscription mode where someone will receive all messages, but when they post their message is only delivered back to them.
I don't think this is really appropriate for Mailman as a whole, but it shouldn't be impossible for you to implement. How's your Python? If you're not too squeamish about poking around in there yourself, I think you should be able to go take a look at the code designed so people don't get their own posts, and do the opposite for people with another bit set. It's going to mess with your user records and such to have this extra setting, but if these people are becoming that much of a problem, it might be worth doing.
If you're not into poking around in Mailman, you could do this before the message makes it to Mailman -- set yourself up a script that, if the message comes from a given set of addresses, sends a message back that looks like it came from mailman (not that hard to forge) containing that message. Then don't bother to send the message on to mailman. This allows you to keep your solution separate from mailman so you won't have to remember to change code again and again when you upgrade (although if your list appearance changes, your "jerk" might notice the discrepancy... most people tune that sort of thing out though). If you're not up for programming this from scratch, you could probably adapt some "vacation" mail script for the purpose -- I'm sure a web search would turn up something appropriate.
Terri

Bill Moseley wrote:
I'd like a subscription mode where someone will receive all messages, but when they post their message is only delivered back to them.
I'm on 2.1.4 and using the "moderate on subscription" ... thus new subscribers are moderated initially ... but once they post a good message, I remove the moderation flag.
I had a idiot subscribe to the list, post a advertisement (which isn't allowed) and then unsubscribe.
The 'initial moderation' feature works well for this. Since only a handful of folks on my list actually post, it's not a big chore to manually approve the first post.
david
-- If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas.
- George Bernard Shaw
participants (4)
-
Bill Moseley
-
Brad Knowles
-
David Gibbs
-
Terri Oda