Re: [Mailman-Developers] [Bug 283751] Re: feature request: fetch archived emails
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/2e8a29939ae47bcb3f13355216707cfe.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
This seems "out of place" for MM, per se. Providing this material is something that is intimately tied to the archiver.
As I see it, the only thing that MM can do is to provide a "pass thru" conduit to whatever archiver the installation has chosen.
Wacky
On Jun 13, 2011, at 1:11 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
I think we'll probably do something like this in Mailman 3, but also, I'm much more fond of providing a Gmane-like NNTP interface to the archives. I find myself subscribing to fewer mailing lists these days and just reading (and replying!) to them via Gmane. Works great.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283751
Title: feature request: fetch archived emails
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/173371753ea2206b9934a9be1bdce423.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Jun 13, 2011, at 07:22 PM, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
This seems "out of place" for MM, per se. Providing this material is something that is intimately tied to the archiver.
As I see it, the only thing that MM can do is to provide a "pass thru" conduit to whatever archiver the installation has chosen.
I think this is exactly right for read-only NNTP, and in fact the current MM3 NNTP bridge could probably be rewritten as an archiver plugin (that's not a bad idea for someone looking to do a bite-size branch!). I think there would need to be tighter integration for the posting side, a la Gmane. Unlike Gmane though, if you post through NNTP and we "know who you are", we wouldn't need to do the verification dance.
-Barry
participants (2)
-
Barry Warsaw
-
Richard Wackerbarth