Re: [Mailman-Developers] [Bug 283751] Re: feature request: fetch archived emails
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67f7f/67f7f97f7c545b1f6419ac07d987343999b5a1a5" alt=""
This seems "out of place" for MM, per se. Providing this material is something that is intimately tied to the archiver.
As I see it, the only thing that MM can do is to provide a "pass thru" conduit to whatever archiver the installation has chosen.
Wacky
On Jun 13, 2011, at 1:11 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/500b6/500b6db67c37c4615bc60a35e5ade42e0af5ac6f" alt=""
On Jun 13, 2011, at 07:22 PM, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
I think this is exactly right for read-only NNTP, and in fact the current MM3 NNTP bridge could probably be rewritten as an archiver plugin (that's not a bad idea for someone looking to do a bite-size branch!). I think there would need to be tighter integration for the posting side, a la Gmane. Unlike Gmane though, if you post through NNTP and we "know who you are", we wouldn't need to do the verification dance.
-Barry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/500b6/500b6db67c37c4615bc60a35e5ade42e0af5ac6f" alt=""
On Jun 13, 2011, at 07:22 PM, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
I think this is exactly right for read-only NNTP, and in fact the current MM3 NNTP bridge could probably be rewritten as an archiver plugin (that's not a bad idea for someone looking to do a bite-size branch!). I think there would need to be tighter integration for the posting side, a la Gmane. Unlike Gmane though, if you post through NNTP and we "know who you are", we wouldn't need to do the verification dance.
-Barry
participants (2)
-
Barry Warsaw
-
Richard Wackerbarth