Re: [Mailman-Developers] Javascript Client for Mailman

Ankush Sharma writes:
I cannot comment on this as I am a student just like you.
First, thank you very much for commenting in the first place! Students helping each other is one of the most exciting aspects of GSoC.
But I think you misunderstand "student" in the context of GSoC. It's an accounting term. "Students" get paid, mentors get tired, er, "T-shirts", that's it! Mentors get T-shirts!
Other than that, we're all Mailman developers. You can and should comment on anything where you have an opinion. Some developers have more experience and skills, some have a natural talent for programming or design or building UIs and others don't have any of the above but need a feature or bugfix, and nobody else seems to want to do it. The good reasons for not giving your opinion are (a) you don't have one (a common reason for those with less experience in the project), (b) somebody's already expressed pretty much the same opinion (in cases where values differ, you might even add a "+1" here), and (c) you're waiting for somebody else to comment first for some reason.
That's a little bit oversimplified, but it's important. I don't know if it's made explicit in the GSoC handbooks, but if you get a chance to talk to Carol or Cat you'll hear that one of the things they enjoy most is hearing about students who become mentors. That's a core value in GSoC: the kind of professional growth that turns students into teachers. And it happens in just one or two years for many students. New members normally don't get that experience in a company (unless you're running it :-).
They also hear stories about how that assumption of responsibility carries over to the new mentor's school and employment opportunities.

Hello,
Well, thanks Stephen for adding and clarifying things. Actually, I have also submitted a proposal on the same and have been doing a lot of research work on this for the past few weeks. So, I added up on the callback stuff. Actually, I felt that it would be lots of work if someone want to have a entire postorius like thing for node as part of the GSoC project. So, for the time focusing on the port will be the best thing. So, I agree with Florian here. As far as the reasons you have suggested for not commenting, I will go with (c) option and the reason being I was lacking on the term "Student" but now things are more clear :-)
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen@xemacs.org> wrote:

Hello,
Well, thanks Stephen for adding and clarifying things. Actually, I have also submitted a proposal on the same and have been doing a lot of research work on this for the past few weeks. So, I added up on the callback stuff. Actually, I felt that it would be lots of work if someone want to have a entire postorius like thing for node as part of the GSoC project. So, for the time focusing on the port will be the best thing. So, I agree with Florian here. As far as the reasons you have suggested for not commenting, I will go with (c) option and the reason being I was lacking on the term "Student" but now things are more clear :-)
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen@xemacs.org> wrote:
participants (2)
-
Ankush Sharma
-
Stephen J. Turnbull