18 Sep
2002
18 Sep
'02
6:38 a.m.
Barry A. Warsaw dijo:
BG> Everything else looks good. The kludge to assume iso-8859-1 BG> on us-ascii pages is unfortunately a generally good one, as BG> that will make the most people happy. I hate to do it, BG> though!
Me too! It means that names in other charsets will be screwed on English lists, but again, I think this is best we can do for a practical 80/20 solution.
from my ignorance: what about using iso-8859-15 instead of -1? it seems to add some forgotten french, finnish, estonian and czech letters. cheers, quique -- Torres más altas han caído.