Hello, Correct me if I'm wrong, but mailman.pot seems to be broken in langpack-22-Oct-2001.tgz. I've found it way too small -- it's only 120480 bytes, and the previous one from 04-Sep-2001 was 164480 bytes long. The difference is caused mainly by the lack of references to bin/* files. I took a quick look into CVS, and there is a version 2.12 of that file which seems to have them back. Which one should we (the translators) choose? Marcin
Hello, Marcin Sochacki writes:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but mailman.pot seems to be broken in langpack-22-Oct-2001.tgz. Yes, you can say that, a few things are missing from the catalog.
mainly by the lack of references to bin/* files. Mainly this causes the smaller size of the new catalog.
I took a quick look into CVS, and there is a version 2.12 of that file which seems to have them back. Which one should we (the translators) choose? Barry was really quick, he made a newer catalog what includes the texts from the bin/ files, and a few modifications, like: #: Mailman/Cgi/admin.py:731 msgid "<br>(Details for <b>%(varname)s</b>)"
I suggest to use the latest one, since it is better. Szilard Vizi ------------- mailto:vizisz@freemail.hu UIN:10676592
"MS" == Marcin Sochacki <wanted@mwd.pl> writes:
MS> Correct me if I'm wrong, but mailman.pot seems to be broken in MS> langpack-22-Oct-2001.tgz. MS> I've found it way too small -- it's only 120480 bytes, and the MS> previous one from 04-Sep-2001 was 164480 bytes long. The MS> difference is caused mainly by the lack of references to bin/* MS> files. MS> I took a quick look into CVS, and there is a version 2.12 of MS> that file which seems to have them back. Which one should we MS> (the translators) choose? Yes, the langpack-22-Oct-2001 is broken and the CVS one is fixed. I will try to get a new langpack (and alpha4) out this weekend. One hitch is that the SF file release seems to be broken, although it's scheduled to be fixed today. -Barry
participants (3)
-
barry＠zope.com -
Marcin Sochacki -
Szilard Vizi