Mailman 3 November 2021 - Mailman-Users

Using cronjob to remove and add members to a mailing list
by Jerry Barnabee 10 Aug '22

10 Aug '22

I want to be able to run a cronjob on my server that uses a php script to add new users and/or remove users from a mailing list. Not having any luck finding any simple examples. My thought is that the php script would get email addresses from a database (which I can do) and then feed them to a mailman command line to either add or remove a user. The cronjob is entered via Cpanel. Have several cronjobs that modify databases but have never tried something that would actually execute a unix command. Thanks, Pineyscripter

3 3

Problem with outlook.com
by nikos 15 Jun '22

15 Jun '22

Hello list. For some reason none of hotmail or outlook users don't receive any of our newsletter. Finally all of them auto unsubscribe. The following is an error received form protection.outlook.com: Remote Server returned '550 5.6.0 CAT.InvalidContent.Exception: ExchangeDataException, Decoding of header Subject failed+ADs- raw value: +AFs-Ps+AF0- +AD0-?iso8859-7?b?wer98fnz5yDF8OX05enh6t7yIOXq5N7r+-fPn8iDz9Oft?+AD0-; cannot handle content of message That happened since September 10th this year. Before, all received without problem. Any suggestions? Thank you in advance. Nikos.

5 9

Re: [Mailman-Users] Automate Moderator Functions
by Andre de Azevedo Cunha 18 Apr '22

18 Apr '22

Hi, i`m trying to reject messages bigger then MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE. I configured my Hold.py was described bellow: replaced hold_for_approval(mlist, msg, msgdata, _ MessageTooBig(bodylen,_mlist.max_message_size)) with rej = MessageTooBig(bodylen, mlist.max_message_size) _ raise Errors.RejectMessage, rej.reason_notice_ The message was rejected, but the sender dont receive any notify about that. The mailman vette log too. How can i solve this? Thanks, André Dennis Putnam wrote: > >I am getting back to this and I have a question about maintenance. What >is the correct way to modify this so that it will not get destroyed by >updates? There are two ways to proceed. You can modify Mailman/Handlers/Hold.py itself, but before overwriting it, make a "diff -u" between the base Hold.py and your modified version to use as a patch to apply after any upgrade. A better way is to leave Hold.py unchanged and make your own edited version as say Mailman/Handlers/MyHold.py. Then you can replace the base Hold.py Module with your MyHold.py by putting GLOBAL_PIPELINE[GLOBAL_PIPELINE.index('Hold')] = 'MyHold' in mm_cfg.py. Note that if you are going to do this, and you want also to move MimeDel before Hold, you must either put the above line after the lines GLOBAL_PIPELINE.remove('MimeDel') GLOBAL_PIPELINE.insert(GLOBAL_PIPELINE.index('Hold'), 'MimeDel') in mm_cfg.py or put it before, but then also change GLOBAL_PIPELINE.insert(GLOBAL_PIPELINE.index('Hold'), 'MimeDel') to GLOBAL_PIPELINE.insert(GLOBAL_PIPELINE.index('MyHold'), 'MimeDel') I recommend the former as in # # Put MimeDel ahead of Hold so "too big" is based on content filtered # message. # GLOBAL_PIPELINE.remove('MimeDel') GLOBAL_PIPELINE.insert(GLOBAL_PIPELINE.index('Hold'), 'MimeDel') # # Replace Hold with local version # GLOBAL_PIPELINE[GLOBAL_PIPELINE.index('Hold')] = 'MyHold' Since mm_cfg.py survives upgrades, this should survive. >Also does this same procedure apply to other automatic rejections such >as implicit destination? >On 9/24/2012 8:43 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >> To automatically reject or discard messages that exceed the list's size >> limit, find the section of the Mailman/Handlers/Hold.py that ends with >> the lines >> >> >> if bodylen/1024.0 > mlist.max_message_size: >> hold_for_approval(mlist, msg, msgdata, >> MessageTooBig(bodylen, >> mlist.max_message_size)) >> # no return >> >> (there is one wrapped line in the above) and replace >> >> hold_for_approval(mlist, msg, msgdata, >> MessageTooBig(bodylen, >> mlist.max_message_size)) >> >> with >> >> rej = MessageTooBig(bodylen, mlist.max_message_size)) >> raise Errors.RejectMessage, rej.reason_notice >> >> to reject the message or with >> >> raise Errors.DiscardMessage >> >> to discard the message. Note that this will not honor the list's >> forward_auto_discards setting. to do that you would need to put >> >> from Mailman.Handlers.Moderate import do_discard >> >> with the other imports near the beginning of the >> Mailman.Handlers.hold.py module and then replace the lines with >> >> do_discard(mlist, msg) Yes, similar changes would apply to other holds in Hold.py. -- Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net [1]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan -- Links: ------ [1] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users

2 11

Newbie User
by David Elliott 17 Mar '22

17 Mar '22

Hi, I am a newbie to Mailman and cpanel and I need some help, please. I have set up a mailing list for my tennis club (about 300 on list) and it seems to work ok BUT each recipient only sees the mailing list name rather than his own email name in the 'to' box. One of the recipients recently did a 'reply to all' and consequently sent his reply to the whole mailing list. I'm sure there must be a way to prevent this but I can't find it! David Elliott

5 6

Munge without CC or Reply-To
by Diez 22 Feb '22

22 Feb '22

Hello. I'm new at this list. I'm trying to setup a list (I'm not the site admin), and I'd like to use Munge From setting, but I'd like not have Reply-To field or CC field, but I suspect is not possible. I was testing with anonymous_list, but the problem is that only a certain member should send some kind of calls, but with anonymous_list anyone could send it. I'm setting up with 2.1.23 version. Regards and thanks in advanced and sorry for my bad english

6 10

Mailman 2.1.38 security release
by Mark Sapiro 30 Nov '21

30 Nov '21

A CSRF vulnerability has been reported by Riccardo Schirone of RedHat. This is assigned CVE-2021-44227. I plan to release Mailman 2.1.38 on Tuesday, 30 November to fix this. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 1

Re: Charter occasionally bouncing mail
by Michael Reeder -- Hygeia MS 30 Nov '21

30 Nov '21

Regarding Microsoft-hosted email -- they also frequently block ALL lists on the basis that the email was not specifically addressed to the recipient. I wrote a tutorial for my users about how to add my list addresses to the safe senders list (known elsewhere as a white list). It is found here: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org/fix-hotmail-and-outlook-to-allow-safe-m… At the time I was mainly thinking its a Hotmail problem -- but it's any email address on any domain hosted at Microsoft. They also seem to do this for any email forwarded from another address -- very annoying when lots of email is being auto-forwarded. Does not seem fixable by any setting that either the email account holder or the email company administrator can adjust. Michael Reeder Hygeia Counseling Services michael(a)hygeiacounseling.com (Now auto-forwarded to an address hosted at Microsoft so I have to safe list every blessed new sender!) ------ Original message------ *From: *Jon Baron *Date: *Mon, Nov 29, 2021 6:57 AM *To: *Jayson Smith; *Cc: *mailman-users(a)python.org; *Subject:*[Mailman-Users] Re: Charter occasionally bouncing mail I have had a lot of experience with these things. Here are some observations. I have a list of 4000+ subscribers around the world. I have SPF and DKIM but not DMARC. (I never say much point in DMARC, and it does not seem necessary.) Right now every single one of the 4000+ subscribers accepts the mail, most of the time. Occasionally I get msssages (from Europe) saying that the mail has been blocked because it is a "high probability of spam" or "looks like spam". This drives me crazy. These spam-blocking systems are unregulated. They are like snake oil. They should not be blocking mail without telling the recipients, and this is what happens. A few times, Microsoft has started blocking mail to ALL addresses with domains of outlook, hotmail, msn, or live. Sometimes this was the result of what you are talking about. I was told to sign up for various things, including "sender support": https://sendersupport.olc.protection.outlook.com/snds/ You can get data on what proportion of your mail counts as spam (if you have enough mail, as we do). When they block mail, you can complain: https://support.microsoft.com/supportrequestform/8ad563e3-288e-2a61-8122-3b… (the one that works for me) or just https://support.microsoft.com/supportrequestform/ If you complain, you will get an automatic reply saying that your problem does not qualify for mitigation and that they are almost always correct. Then you have to respond to that. After a few rounds of this, you will get a response from what seems to be a human being, who will tell you that they are taking your problem very seriously, yada yada. The last time this happened, they were completely blocking all make for over a week, because my IPV4 address (the one they use) was part of a range of addresses from which spam was being sent. Of course, I have only one ipv4 address (from a cloud server, Linode). The problem seems fixed for now, but I am warning new subscribers not to use Microsoft-controlled addresses. Of course they won't tell you HOW they decide that something is spam, as this information would just make it easier for spammers. (But I don't see what is so bad about spam. You just delete it; it helps if possible spam goes to a spefific folder, but any system I've seen makes many mistakes both ways, except spamassassin, which rarely makes a false positive. The real problem is phishing, and there have been no randomized control trials to see whether any system can immunize people against that. I doubt that these spam detectors do it effectively.) Some references: https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook_com/forum/all/hotmailoutlook-bl… https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/thread/… And there are several things like this: https://mxtoolbox.com/blacklists.aspx But the list called UCEPROTECT3 (I think) is now, happily, widely ignored, because it is based on spam coming from a large range of ipv6 addresses on a cloud server. Spamhause does something like this too, but you can fix it by getting a "proper" ipv6 address that specifies the range ("/64" at the end). Some geneneral On 11/29/21 00:51, Jayson Smith wrote: > Hi again, > > Good point about DMARC. Does anyone know if Charter suddenly started > caring about some DMARC policies on or around this past Friday? I > have my list set to munge the From: lines of messages from senders > E.G. AOL, Yahoo, etc. that publish a DMARC rejection policy. > > On a slightly different topic, I've heard from a few Outlook users > that list messages are consistently ending up in their junkmail > folders. Could this be because Microsoft doesn't like the fact that > my list is causing DMARC to fail, but not actually complaining to me > about it? I could solve this problem by having the list munge the > From: line for all messages, but sometimes that causes problems with > replying. In particular, several years ago when my lists were set up > to do that, Thunderbird users were having problems sometimes replying > to the sender of a message rather than the entire list. > > Jayson > > On 11/28/2021 11:45 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > >On 11/28/21 7:58 PM, Jayson Smith wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >> > >>One of my Mailman lists has a single member at Charter which has > >>occasionally bounced mail over the last few days. When this > >>happens, the reason given, when I look it up on their help page, > >>indicates the message I sent goes against the security policies > >>of my domain, and I should contact my domain administrator (that > >>would be me). I have SPF and DKIM set up, and a quick check at > >>dkimvalidator.com <http://dkimvalidator.com> verifies they're both working. I assume this is > >>one of these annoying situations where Charter is seeing what's > >>clearly a transient DNS problem and treating it like a permanent > >>failure? Also I assume there's nothing I can do about this? Is > >>the problem likely to be at Charter's end or at my domain's > >>nameservers' end? > > > > > >Only guessing, but this sounds like DMARC. Does your list apply > >DMARC mitigations? > > > >If it is DMARC, the issue is the message sent to the charter > >subscriber is From:poster@posters.domain.posters.do <http://posters.do>main publishes > >a DMARC policy of (probably) reject. Yahoo.com <http://Yahoo.com> is one such common > >domain. Your list modifies the message by content filtering, > >subject prefixing, adding msg_footer or some other transformation > >that breaks the posters.do <http://posters.do>main DKIM signature. Your SPF and DKIM > >signatures pass, but they are not 'aligned' with posters.do <http://posters.do>main, so > >they don't count for DMARC. > > > >See https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > Mailman-Users mailing list --mailman-users(a)python.org > To unsubscribe send an email tomailman-users-leave(a)python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/ > Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 > Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 > Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/ > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/ -- Jonathan Baron, Professor of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania Home page:https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~baron Founding Editor: Judgment and Decision Making (http://journal.sjdm.org) ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list --mailman-users(a)python.org To unsubscribe send an email tomailman-users-leave(a)python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/ Mailman FAQ:http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy:http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/ https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/

2 2

Charter occasionally bouncing mail
by Jayson Smith 30 Nov '21

30 Nov '21

Hi, One of my Mailman lists has a single member at Charter which has occasionally bounced mail over the last few days. When this happens, the reason given, when I look it up on their help page, indicates the message I sent goes against the security policies of my domain, and I should contact my domain administrator (that would be me). I have SPF and DKIM set up, and a quick check at dkimvalidator.com verifies they're both working. I assume this is one of these annoying situations where Charter is seeing what's clearly a transient DNS problem and treating it like a permanent failure? Also I assume there's nothing I can do about this? Is the problem likely to be at Charter's end or at my domain's nameservers' end? Thanks, Jayson

5 7

Sorting list names
by Scott High 16 Nov '21

16 Nov '21

Hi, new user, forgive me if old issue, but I've searched FAQ and wiki and can't find answer. Running Mailman 2.1.12, on the Virtualmin Mailman Mailing Lists UI, I'm simply trying to sort the list names alphabetically. Is this possible? I can't for the life of me find it if it is a UI option. Does it need to be sorted at the file system level or database level for the UI to reflect it, maybe? Thanks for any help!

3 2

web interface error after 2.1.36 update
by ddewey＠cyberthugs.com 16 Nov '21

16 Nov '21

Hello... just ran into an issue after what I thought was a successful routine update to mailman 2.1.36 (from .29? iirc) on Friday. Everything seemed fine after the update (following the config/make/make install) and I hadn't had occasion to log into the admin interface until today when I hit this (apparent) bug. Mail is being received and delivered just fine. The subscriber interface appears working. Simply trying to log into the Admindb user interface... entered my password and receive "Bug in Mailman version 2.1.36 We're sorry, we hit a bug!" Don't see any obvious permissions errors, nor does check_perms return anything. Below is the log output from Mailman error log. Nothing interesting in the httpd log. Thanks for any pointers! Nov 15 15:30:58 2021 admin(30830): @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ admin(30830): [----- Mailman Version: 2.1.36 -----] admin(30830): [----- Traceback ------] admin(30830): Traceback (most recent call last): admin(30830): File "/usr/local/mailman/scripts/driver", line 117, in run_main admin(30830): main() admin(30830): File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Cgi/admindb.py", line 342, in main admin(30830): print doc.Format() admin(30830): File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/htmlformat.py", line 352, in Format admin(30830): output.append(Container.Format(self, indent)) admin(30830): File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/htmlformat.py", line 267, in Format admin(30830): output.append(HTMLFormatObject(item, indent)) admin(30830): File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/htmlformat.py", line 53, in HTMLFormatObject admin(30830): return item.Format(indent) admin(30830): File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/htmlformat.py", line 445, in Format admin(30830): % csrf_token(self.mlist, self.contexts, self.user) admin(30830): File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/CSRFcheck.py", line 53, in csrf_token admin(30830): mac = sha_new(secret + issued).hexdigest() admin(30830): TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'NoneType' and 'str' admin(30830): [----- Python Information -----] admin(30830): sys.version = 2.7.5 (default, Aug 13 2020, 02:51:10) [GCC 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-39)] admin(30830): sys.executable = /usr/bin/python admin(30830): sys.prefix = /usr admin(30830): sys.exec_prefix = /usr admin(30830): sys.path = ['/usr/local/mailman/pythonlib', '/usr/local/mailman', '/usr/local/mailman/scripts', '/usr/lib64/python27.zip', '/usr/lib64/python2.7', '/usr/lib64/python2.7/plat-linux2', '/usr/lib64/python2.7/lib-tk', '/usr/lib64/python2.7/lib-old', '/usr/lib64/python2.7/lib-dynload', '/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages', '/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages', '/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages', '/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/gtk-2.0', '/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages', '/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages', '/usr/lib/site-python'] admin(30830): sys.platform = linux2 admin(30830): [----- Environment Variables -----] admin(30830): CONTENT_LENGTH: 41 admin(30830): CONTENT_TYPE: application/x-www-form-urlencoded admin(30830): SERVER_NAME: list.listdomain.com admin(30830): REMOTE_ADDR: 67.253.227.163 admin(30830): PYTHONPATH: /usr/local/mailman admin(30830): REMOTE_PORT: 3777 admin(30830): REQUEST_SCHEME: http admin(30830): SCRIPT_NAME: /mailman/admindb admin(30830): REQUEST_METHOD: POST admin(30830): HTTP_HOST: list.list_domain.com admin(30830): PATH_INFO: /list_name admin(30830): SERVER_PORT: 80 admin(30830): SERVER_PROTOCOL: HTTP/1.1 admin(30830): QUERY_STRING: admin(30830): REQUEST_URI: /mailman/admindb/list_name admin(30830): HTTP_COOKIE: admin(30830): DOCUMENT_ROOT: /var/www/html/list.list_domain.com

2 1