Mailman-Users

mailman-users@python.org

33893 discussions

Held message notifications are not being sent to moderators
by Bruce Johnson 23 Jun '22

23 Jun '22

We have numerous lists set as announcement lists by setting all members as moderated. However the moderators are not getting notifications for held messages; only the list owner is getting the notifications. This is a new-ish phenomenon, since I know they used to be sent to all the moderators, too. I can see the held messages in the vette logfile, and the smtp logfile shows the message to the list owner being sent, twice, but that’s it. vette: Jun 22 11:02:39 2022 (1248) Faculty post from johnson(a)pharmacy.arizona.edu held, message-id=<980174D2-74F6-4C25-8E2B-A21440D9D698(a)pharmacy.arizona.edu>: Post by non-member to a members-only list SMTP: Jun 22 11:02:41 2022 (1260) <mailman.358.1655920959.1248.faculty(a)pharmacy.arizona.edu> smtp to faculty for 1 recips, completed in 0.105 seconds Jun 22 11:02:41 2022 (1260) <mailman.360.1655920959.1248.faculty(a)pharmacy.arizona.edu> smtp to faculty for 1 recips, completed in 0.105 seconds As our office gets the emails for the list owners I was able to confirm the message ID for the notification. This is a problem, obviously. Is there any weird setting I could have made to break this? -- Bruce Johnson University of Arizona College of Pharmacy Information Technology Group Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs

2 5

Approved postings are not being delivered
by Francis Jayakanth 22 Jun '22

22 Jun '22

Hi, I moderate and administrate a professional discussion list with about 6,000 subscribers. Most of the subscribers use Gmail, Yahoo, or other free email services. In the recent past, approved list postings are not being delivered to Gmail and Yahoo. I have subscribed to the list using my Gmail, Yahoo, and official email ids. I receive approved list messages only to my official email id, but not to my other two email ids. Our network support team tells me that the issue is because of the blacklisting of the email relay host used for mailing list service. Can someone help me to resolve the issue? I'm using Mailman 2.1.20 Thanks, Francis

2 1

Odd issue after setting Mailman to use https by default.
by Bruce Johnson 21 Jun '22

21 Jun '22

Last week I got a notification from our SSL cert provider that the cert for our mailman server was expiring, so I renewed it, and realized that when I rebuilt the server last year I didn’t actually enable it in Apache. So I did, and added a rewrite rule in the httpd.conf to force all traffic to use https. After that, whenever a moderator or admin tried to submit a response for a held message, we would get a pop-up stating that “This form is insecure” , if we proceeded, the form submitted but nothing would happen…the message was not approved or discarded. After I removed the rewrite rule, the action works now, but it drops me onto the http:// site not https:// . Is there some site setting in Mailman I am missing to tell it to always use https:// ? (MM version version 2.1.29 running on Rocky Linux 8.5) -- Bruce Johnson University of Arizona College of Pharmacy Information Technology Group Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs

2 1

What can cause "Munge From" (from_is_list) to have no effect?
by Mark Hills 19 Jun '22

19 Jun '22

I'm having trouble with a Mailman install which I maintain for a charity (2.1.39_1 on FreeBSD 12.3-p5) In diagnosing a DMARC "FAIL" reported in Gmail I notice that some settings are having absolutely no effect: from_is_list dmarc_moderation_action dmarc_quarantine_moderation_action dmarc_none_moderation_action So in my testing today, at no point have I been able to get Mailman to "Munge From" or "Wrap Message" in any way. Other nearby settings work, so I am able to change the config; it's the correct list etc. I've also tried re-starting. Logs in /usr/local/mailman/log aren't showing any errors or hints. As some feedback, an FAQ [*] mentions ALLOW_FROM_IS_LIST; setting this has no impact, not suprising as the source code doesn't seem to mention this string anyway. Reading more carefully, I can see this doesn't apply to the current version; perhaps someone with Wiki access might consider the manner it's written, whilst technically correct, is a little backward/confusing, or removing old information. [*] https://wiki.list.org/DOC/What%20can%20I%20do%20about%20members%20being%20u… Many thanks -- Mark

2 3

Web links in templates - is this non-default?
by Andy Smith 19 Jun '22

19 Jun '22

Hi, From Mailman 2 I am used to various administrative emails having web links in them for ease of use. For example, when confirming your subscription to a list I am used to the confirmation email having both an embedded code for replying back and also a link to the web interface for confirming by web. On a new install of mailman3-full on Debian 11 I am not seeing any web links, only text regarding replying by email, how to change options by email, etc. Am I right in thinking that this is intentional, it is not some simple thing that I missed or forgotten to enable? I'm assuming because mailman3 can function without any web interface so it was considered that adding links to Postorious by default would not be the correct thing to do? If that is the case, is the correct way to achieve what I want to add a bunch of custom templates? It seems like it might be a common desire, so have anyone done this already? I searched around but I've found it difficult to come up with good search terms for this. Thanks, Andy

2 1

New install - Where's 'changeme@example.com' coming from?
by Andy Smith 18 Jun '22

18 Jun '22

Hi, I've just installed mailman3 (well, mailman3-full) on a Debian 11 host from Debian packages. I thought I'd gone through /etc/mailman3/mailman.cfg thoroughly, but I am seeing the From: address changeme(a)example.com in some administrative notifications. Now, when I search for help on this everything says that I have not set site_owner in /etc/mailman3/mailman.cfg, but I have! As an example of what I am seeing, when I use the web interface to unsubscribe a list member, the member themself gets a notification as expected: From: testing-bounces(a)lists.strugglers.net To: andy-again(a)strugglers.net Subject: You have been unsubscribed from the Testing mailing list but the list's owner gets one from "changeme(a)example.com": From: changeme(a)example.com To: testing-owner(a)lists.strugglers.net Subject: Testing unsubscription notification andy-again2(a)strugglers.net has been removed from Testing. I can't for the life of me work out where this is coming from: $ sudo ack site_owner /etc/mailman3 /etc/mailman3/mailman.cfg 28:site_owner: postmaster(a)lists.strugglers.net $ sudo ack changeme /etc/mailman3 (no output) It's not in any of the sqlite DBs either (still on sqlite while testing things out): $ sudo sqlite3 /var/lib/mailman3/data/mailman.db .dump | grep -i changeme $ sudo sqlite3 /var/lib/mailman3/web/mailman3web.db .dump | grep -i changeme So where can this possibly be coming from? I have not yet configured the MTA (Exim) for delivering to Mailman, and I haven't done anything special about sending settings: [mta] # … outgoing: mailman.mta.deliver.deliver smtp_host: localhost smtp_port: 25 configuration: python:mailman.config.exim4 Thanks, Andy

1 1

Problem with outlook.com
by nikos 15 Jun '22

15 Jun '22

Hello list. For some reason none of hotmail or outlook users don't receive any of our newsletter. Finally all of them auto unsubscribe. The following is an error received form protection.outlook.com: Remote Server returned '550 5.6.0 CAT.InvalidContent.Exception: ExchangeDataException, Decoding of header Subject failed+ADs- raw value: +AFs-Ps+AF0- +AD0-?iso8859-7?b?wer98fnz5yDF8OX05enh6t7yIOXq5N7r+-fPn8iDz9Oft?+AD0-; cannot handle content of message That happened since September 10th this year. Before, all received without problem. Any suggestions? Thank you in advance. Nikos.

5 9

Removing the option to delete a list on the Postorious interface
by Wong, Wesley 14 Jun '22

14 Jun '22

Hi, I have a question on the Postorious web interface in Mailman 3. I have found that a list owner can delete a list through the Postorious interface if they have the role of owner to the list. I wanted to have it either disabled or removed but I am not sure where to look to make changes to it. I would rather remove it from the interface totally so it would be done from the command line. Any help would be greatly appreciated. wesley

2 1

Sender filters accept_these_nonmembers from another list
by Bob Williams 04 Jun '22

04 Jun '22

I would like to allow all the members of list_A to post to list_B. list_A contains about 50 addresses, so rather than add each one to the 'List of non-member addresses whose postings should be automatically accepted' (Privacy options > Sender filters > Nonmember filters) I have added "@list_A" in that box. However, I still get asked to authorise postings to list_B by members of list_A. Both list_A and list_B are in the same domain and hosted on the same cPanel server. Have I misunderstood how to do this, or is there another setting somewhere else that I need to toggle? Thank you Bob -- Bob Williams

2 2

Filter Rule precedence, Sender filters or Spam filters?
by Bob Williams 02 Jun '22

02 Jun '22

If I have a list of addresses/domains in Sender filters > List of non-member addresses whose postings will be automatically discarded and also a Spam filter containing the rule X-Spam-Status:\s+Yes which one is applied first for a message that satisfies both? Bob -- Bob Williams

2 2

Jump to page: