I manage a list through CPanel v. 94.0.2 and I also have server access (from our paid host). Mailman v.2.1.33-2.cp1186.Â
I just tried to send a message and got this:
"A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The
following address(es) failed: pipe to |/usr/local/cpanel/3rdparty/mailman/mail/mailman post
nome-announce_nomekennelclub.com generated by nome-announce(a)nomekennelclub.com local delivery failed"
Others can post and I subscribed a different email address and can post using that. Just not my administrative email. I
recently had removed my account from Gmail and set it up in Thunderbird, so I'm wondering if that could be the issue.
I found a similar post somewhere from way back that said to issue the command /usr/local/cpanel/scripts/fixmailman ,
which I did but no with effect.
I've been poking around and under /usr/local/cpanel/3rdpartymailman/locks are 2 files (but none ending in .lock:
master-qrunner
master-qrunner.cloud.nomekennelclub.com.748
(I unsubscribed my email and tried to resubscribe but got the same error when replying to the confirmation email.
I see there is a /usr/local/cpanel/3rdpartymailman/scripts/check_perms script that someone wayback when said run as
./check_perms -f but I would like to hear if that is smart or not.
If I cat /etc/valiases/nomekennelclub.com I get:
abuse(a)nomekennelclub.com: <snip>@gmail.com
nkc(a)nomekennelclub.com: nomekennelclub(a)gmail.com
nome-announce-admin(a)nomekennelclub.com: "|/usr/local/cpanel/3rdparty/mailman/mail/mailman admin
nome-announce_nomekennelclub.com"
<snip>
nome-announce-subscribe(a)nomekennelclub.com: "|/usr/local/cpanel/3rdparty/mailman/mail/mailman subscribe
nome-announce_nomekennelclub.com"
nome-announce-unsubscribe(a)nomekennelclub.com: "|/usr/local/cpanel/3rdparty/mailman/mail/mailman unsubscribe
nome-announce_nomekennelclub.com"
nome-announce(a)nomekennelclub.com: "|/usr/local/cpanel/3rdparty/mailman/mail/mailman post nome-announce_nomekennelclub.com"
owner-nome-announce(a)nomekennelclub.com: nome-announce-admin(a)nomekennelclub.com
postmaster(a)nomekennelclub.com: <snip>@gmail.com
root(a)nomekennelclub.com: <snip>@gmail.com
*: james(a)dorydesign.com
That last email is the problem one.
thx
Hello,
I am the mailing list administrator for a charity cycling team. The list
currently has about 150 members. The list and our website is hosted by a
local ISP who is running Mailman 2.1.34.
We seem to be having all too frequent occurrences of multiple bounces that
seem to be related only to the domain of the address recipient. Previously
we have had issues with AOL.com and Mindspring.com email domains. The main
result of these are disabled subscriptions due to excessive bounces.
The latest in this continuing saga occurred on Monday morning when I
received notification that 12! list members with Yahoo.com email domain
addresses had been unsubscribed from the list! I am assuming that this is
the sum total of ALL yahoo addresses in our list.
The interesting thing about this occurrence other than losing the name
associated with the email address (since the members were unsubscribed not
just disabled) is that I NEVER received ANY bounce notifications other than
the unsubscribe notification. I find this quite odd and unsettling
considering that the list shows that it IS configured to send earlier
bounce notifications and I have received them in the past... just not
leading up to this latest incident. The typical error message is:
jonxx_dajxxn(a)yahoo.com <jones_dajuan(a)yahoo.com> has been removed from
MSing-ride. (disabled address)
So I guess that my question is whether or not these types of problems are
now endemic to all email lists or if....Our ISP is technically "challenged"
and
1. Doesn't know how to properly configure Mailman to send out the requested
notifications.
2. Continues to get blacklisted for sending SPAM even though they don't.
Thanks for any insight.
Steve
Good day,
Looking for a solution to have about 50-200 lists for subscribers. Any good examples of mailman being used for 50+ lists you can share for me to see? Trying to see
the feasibility of implementing a solution in next 90 days.
Would like to see a working one, where a user would go to a site, and pick a list to subscribe.
Is mailman easy to setup and maintain?
Windows or Linux server recommended?
Thank you.
David.
I have a strange, occasionally occurring phenomenon on one of my
mailing lists (in Mailman 2.29) which I don't understand:
1. A subscribed address to the list tries to post a message to
the list.
2. The attempted posting does not go through to the list, nor
does it go to the moderation queue. Instead, I the list admin
receives a message via the bounces-address with a copy of the
attempted posting.
3. The bounce message looks like/similar to the bounce message
that is generated when a bounce happens at one single
individual subscriber's e-mail address. But in that case the
list archive as well as other subscribers (including me)
will get a copy of the posting. And that is not the case here.
No copy to me, nothing in the archive.
So the only trace I can see of the posting is the weird bounce
message containing a copy of the posting.
Why doesn't the attempted posting go to the moderator queue, if
there is something about the subscriber or the message that
prevents it from being distributed? (The list in question is
unmoderated for subscribers.)
Below is a copy of one of the strange bounce postings.
Thomas Gramstad
thomas(a)gramstad.no
----
Is it technically possible to interact via an API from a simple mobile app
with different Mailman servers?
My thought is something simple that could in theory be expanded into an app
that interfaces with your groups and public groups on Mailman, BuddyPress,
Discourse and other open source hosted online groups. You'd paste in the
URLs of your online groups/list sites in some way.
Like the olden days of news groups and the experience of an RSS reader, you
could quickly scan the number of new posts over X time or since you last
opened the app and then dip into the groups of interest and if you can
authenticate yourself, post on lists/groups where you are a member.
Thoughts?
I am evaluating whether in the age of Facebook Groups, NextDoor, and mobile
apps if an open source/non-commercial path to viable online neighborhood
groups with mass participation is possible. We have a bunch of online
groups to move from GroupServer for E-Democracy.org.
Thanks,
Steven Clift
P.S. I see that this is out there for Discourse:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.discourse
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:28:46 +0100, Johannes Rohr <jorohr(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> for some lists, the listowners in the last few days keep getting "pending
> moderator requests" emails every day, even though there are no pending
> requests.
>
> What mechanism generates these requests and how can I get rid of those
> redundant mails? (short of migrating to mailman 3 which I plan on doing)
>
> Cheers, thanks a lot in advance,
>
> Johannes
Hi Johannes, this may not be your problem, but I had a similar one:
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/message/JC7A…
In case that wraps badly for you:
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org
and search "SOLVED" and sort by latest first. It will be on top.
The version of Mailman it refers-to is shown in the subject line.
Kind regards
Dear all,
for some lists, the listowners in the last few days keep getting "pending
moderator requests" emails every day, even though there are no pending
requests.
What mechanism generates these requests and how can I get rid of those
redundant mails? (short of migrating to mailman 3 which I plan on doing)
Cheers, thanks a lot in advance,
Johannes
Hey all, I am looking for examples where folks have further adapted their
HyperKitty archives to engage users looking for more of a social
network/blog like experience.
Suggestions?
I am looking for examples that essentially feature the original post in
full and then present expandable replies below like comments.
Thanks,
Steve
I want all mails sent to the list to come from the list's email address...
But, in this case, if the user forgets to sign their name at the
bottom of their mail body, effectively the mail to the list is
anonymous...!
Is there a way to add the user name (or email address) to the top of
each mail so that the mails have the name of the sender, while the
mail itself comes from the list address?
I have looked high and low for an answer, but noone seems to have the solution.
Thank you!
Mal
Dear Mailman folk,
I am subscribed to an OpenWRT mailing list, which (according to the
X-Mailman-Verson header in emails I receive from the list) uses Mailman
2.1.29.
Most of the mail on that list comes through just fine.
DMARC email comes through with the Subject: field blank, though.
Is that expected? https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC does not appear to
mention the Subject: header being left out of the wrapper, when Mailman
wraps a message to satisfy DMARC. This means that in my MUA, those
messages are displayed without a Subject.
An example of an affected email is shown below, including the full
headers.
Is there a Mailman 2 setting that I could recommend to the OpenWRT list
managers, that would make Mailman copy the Subject: header from the
original message to the wrapper, so that my MUA would show the subject
as intended by the sender?
Thank you in advance for your help,
Sam
----- Forwarded message from "Etan Kissling (IC) via openwrt-devel" -----
Return-Path:
<openwrt-devel-bounces+sampablokuper=posteo.net(a)lists.openwrt.org>
Delivered-To: unknown
Received: from posteo.de (185.67.36.145:993) by zian2 with IMAP4-SSL; 08 Feb
2021 21:32:21 -0000
Delivered-To: sampablokuper(a)posteo.net
Received: from proxy02.posteo.name ([127.0.0.1])
by dovecot12 (Dovecot) with LMTP id 5oSRHYDhIGBLfgAAJesNpQ
for <sampablokuper(a)posteo.net>; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 10:02:45 +0100
Received: from proxy02.posteo.de ([127.0.0.1])
by proxy02.posteo.name (Dovecot) with LMTP id GTflGLf5IGDQWQEAGFAyLg
; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 10:02:45 +0100
Received: from mailin04.posteo.de (unknown [10.0.0.64])
by proxy02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DZ0Qq63k7z12Ck
for <sampablokuper(a)posteo.net>; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:02:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mx04.posteo.de (mailin04.posteo.de [127.0.0.1])
by mailin04.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9627620F6B
for <sampablokuper(a)posteo.net>; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:02:27 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at posteo.de
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.533
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.533 tagged_above=-1000 required=7
tests=[MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, MISSING_SUBJECT=1.767,
POSTEO_BTC_B=0.01, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, T_RCVD_IN_ABUSIX_WHITE=0.01]
autolearn=disabled
Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134])
by mx04.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DZ0Qk1lB3z10Zm
for <sampablokuper(a)posteo.net>; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:02:21 +0100 (CET)
Authentication-Results: posteo.de; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lists.openwrt.org
Authentication-Results: posteo.de;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=(a)lists.infradead.org header.b=xkN+h566;
dkim-atps=neutral
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type:List-Help:
Reply-To:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:Cc:From:List-Post:
List-Id:Message-ID:MIME-Version:To:References:Date:In-reply-to:Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:
Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner;
bh=BodNZRxYJ/ulISXrw/8ihEr0xuP4150RxcU4mqQbzK4=; b=xkN+h566WmBldbwfdHkBfI157
PDL/CI0WdfrRg5YTGiuFXnzvBoBLF5IU/Bhnrmhetwjs9z85NME1nKUXF49jqPTUc3D2/zqtd5vMk
eVXY3/uAHIzbMWZL/bQQkRCADY44YEKBGflD0HlIttHy9gtqaZLBalRL435qoqxfhab8GntX0GiVO
GSBqAmBp5VObGm+1oj//HwddZz4QuFWyEObG4MPsqtw7MFGK8FVw1Dumq36cUxICpD7teIcUhDP1y
jLQ5xuMsSXJfeGL+NPp4Ki5pWywa/L4W9GAlOijWiFXVtk++j66AoyHHsjDwYyklgieQzOW/37ha/
G0ztzuEKw==;
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org)
by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux))
id 1l92Nh-0000HM-50; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 08:58:53 +0000
In-reply-to: <YBz6Pjl2SFe6Ky0L@thunderclap>
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 09:58:38 +0100
References: <YBz6Pjl2SFe6Ky0L@thunderclap>
To: Baptiste Jonglez <baptiste(a)bitsofnetworks.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <mailman.1473.1612774732.941.openwrt-devel(a)lists.openwrt.org>
List-Id: OpenWrt Development List <openwrt-devel.lists.openwrt.org>
List-Post: <mailto:openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org>
From: "Etan Kissling (IC) via openwrt-devel" <openwrt-devel(a)lists.openwrt.org>
Precedence: list
Cc: openwrt-devel(a)lists.openwrt.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
X-BeenThere: openwrt-devel(a)lists.openwrt.org
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel>,
<mailto:openwrt-devel-request@lists.openwrt.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/options/openwrt-devel>,
<mailto:openwrt-devel-request@lists.openwrt.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/>
Reply-To: "Etan Kissling (IC)" <etan_kissling(a)apple.com>
List-Help: <mailto:openwrt-devel-request@lists.openwrt.org?subject=help>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4994977490922860622=="
Sender: openwrt-devel <openwrt-devel-bounces(a)lists.openwrt.org>
Errors-To: openwrt-devel-bounces+sampablokuper=posteo.net(a)lists.openwrt.org
X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX
Content-Length: 7001
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.
Received: from ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com ([17.171.2.68]) by
merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id
1l92Nd-0000EE-Uz for openwrt-devel(a)lists.openwrt.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021
08:58:51 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com [127.0.0.1]) by
ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id
1188r62T023472; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 00:58:42 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apple.com;
h=content-type : mime-version : subject : from : in-reply-to : date : cc :
content-transfer-encoding : message-id : references : to; s=20180706;
bh=+2HgbfEc8d2AnW/LqWiaafnkQdP0EWNyIoczFiPBM/Q=;
b=i8Hp/kqjR8nz8o0yxx5I898YX8rveNwKUkxOQoINhu4EFpDNIpuiNp31MRQ2U/8UnP5N
PvyWiHBqu3F8ccfF/gWXFT2SxV5hiucAXwfYxMDJqehDFXA0mFmu7JCjeA5QtGKH485K
KiTzkGqyTQ2oGBg7YJAkH3Em6d80BdwSJIY6kJtmrlBmau+2C7tRiPDJVTI522TzblY2
KLcSq+AVpYhnoM2m2fIYzQZYT8pXAz9h7Y8P8OpsO/xlpr0Rt3gmfoIXLbkLOXVgZKXo
TEyQj5ElOrieQUanyx0B3g9EpiuS6R7uUsABjyz+9GeSY41T7GwnXOlMKoma0n3FwqHS nQ==
Received: from crk-mailsvcp-mta-lapp02.euro.apple.com
(crk-mailsvcp-mta-lapp02.euro.apple.com [17.66.55.14]) by
ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com with ESMTP id 36hrnvuw60-1 (version=TLSv1.2
cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 08 Feb 2021
00:58:42 -0800
Received: from crk-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp02.euro.apple.com
(crk-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp02.euro.apple.com [17.72.136.16]) by
crk-mailsvcp-mta-lapp02.euro.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging
Server 8.1.0.7.20201203 64bit (built Dec 3 2020)) with ESMTPS id
<0QO700RCRCXS0B00(a)crk-mailsvcp-mta-lapp02.euro.apple.com>; Mon, 08 Feb 2021
08:58:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from process_milters-daemon.crk-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp02.euro.apple.com
by crk-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp02.euro.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging
Server 8.1.0.7.20201203 64bit (built Dec 3 2020)) id
<0QO700K00CFZA900(a)crk-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp02.euro.apple.com>; Mon, 08 Feb 2021
08:58:40 +0000 (GMT)
X-Va-A:
X-Va-T-CD: 9afdb31050d7d5317f70deb897281ad1
X-Va-E-CD: 67e6792f740908ddf1e16c3353593782
X-Va-R-CD: b67e6762d78a271b674cde5fdf0795bd
X-Va-CD: 0
X-Va-ID: 3c6f3588-7a2f-4a6c-b999-58547bff9a59
X-V-A:
X-V-T-CD: 9afdb31050d7d5317f70deb897281ad1
X-V-E-CD: 67e6792f740908ddf1e16c3353593782
X-V-R-CD: b67e6762d78a271b674cde5fdf0795bd
X-V-CD: 0
X-V-ID: a85131a9-49e2-48c0-b1b4-e57b988944b5
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369,18.0.737
definitions=2021-02-08_02:2021-02-08,2021-02-08 signatures=0
Received: from [17.235.216.39] by crk-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp02.euro.apple.com
(Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.7.20201203 64bit (built Dec 3
2020)) with ESMTPSA id
<0QO700FJLCXQ2B00(a)crk-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp02.euro.apple.com>; Mon, 08 Feb 2021
08:58:40 +0000 (GMT)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Subject: Re: Upcoming 19.07.7 release
From: "Etan Kissling (IC)" <etan_kissling(a)apple.com>
In-reply-to: <YBz6Pjl2SFe6Ky0L@thunderclap>
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 09:58:38 +0100
Cc: openwrt-devel(a)lists.openwrt.org
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <1C978121-80FE-4E89-B587-60893371EF8A(a)apple.com>
References: <YBz6Pjl2SFe6Ky0L@thunderclap>
To: Baptiste Jonglez <baptiste(a)bitsofnetworks.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369,18.0.737
definitions=2021-02-08_02:2021-02-08,2021-02-08 signatures=0
X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3
X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210208_035850_214778_58700E6F
X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.59 )
X-Spam-Score: -5.8 (-----)
X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on merlin.infradead.org summary:
Content analysis details: (-5.8 points) pts rule name
description ---- ----------------------
-------------------------------------------------- -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI
RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
high trust
[17.171.2.68 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2)
[17.171.2.68 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0
SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS
SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message
has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a
valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK
signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK
signature from envelope-from domain -0.6
DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - High trust sender
I have posted a few backports to 19.07 from master a few weeks back, with these subjects:
1. [PATCH 19.07] mbedtls: add config option to compile with hkdf
2. [PATCH 19.07] hostapd: add multicast_to_unicast and per_sta_vif
3. [PATCH 19.07] hostapd: enable CTRL_IFACE_MIB for hostapd-full
4. [PATCH 19.07] nf-conntrack: allow querying conntrack info in nfqueue
5. [PATCH 19.07] libnetfilter-queue: update to 1.0.5
My patches don't end up in Patchwork for some reason.
If those are acceptable, be sure to take the latest submission for the patches that were submitted multiple times.
Thanks
Etan
> On 5 Feb 2021, at 08:56, Baptiste Jonglez <baptiste(a)bitsofnetworks.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We are planning a new 19.07 release in about a week (probably next week-end).
>
> If you are aware of changes that need to be integrated, now is the time to
> do it or mention it here!
>
> I plan to test & integrate a workaround for this ramips stability issue:
> https://bugs.openwrt.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=2628
>
> Baptiste
>
> PS: please don't ask about 21.XX
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel(a)lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel(a)lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
----- End forwarded message -----