On 7/1/08, Mark Sapiro wrote:
In this snapshot
PID USERNAME LWP PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME CPU COMMAND 10123 mailman 1 59 0 314M 311M sleep 1:57 0.02% python 10131 mailman 1 59 0 310M 307M sleep 1:35 0.01% python 10124 mailman 1 59 0 309M 78M sleep 0:45 0.10% python 10134 mailman 1 59 0 307M 81M sleep 1:27 0.01% python 10125 mailman 1 59 0 307M 79M sleep 0:42 0.01% python 10133 mailman 1 59 0 44M 41M sleep 0:14 0.01% python 10122 mailman 1 59 0 34M 30M sleep 0:43 0.39% python 10127 mailman 1 59 0 31M 27M sleep 0:40 0.26% python 10130 mailman 1 59 0 30M 26M sleep 0:15 0.03% python 10129 mailman 1 59 0 28M 24M sleep 0:19 0.10% python 10126 mailman 1 59 0 28M 25M sleep 1:07 0.59% python 10132 mailman 1 59 0 27M 24M sleep 1:00 0.46% python 10128 mailman 1 59 0 27M 24M sleep 0:16 0.01% python 10151 mailman 1 59 0 9516K 3852K sleep 0:05 0.01% python 10150 mailman 1 59 0 9500K 3764K sleep 0:00 0.00% python
Which processes correspond to which runners. And why are the two processes that have apparently done the least the ones that have grown the most.
In contrast, the mail server for python.org shows the following:
top - 06:54:48 up 29 days, 9:09, 4 users, load average: 1.05, 1.08, 0.95 Tasks: 151 total, 1 running, 149 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie Cpu(s): 0.2% user, 1.1% system, 0.0% nice, 98.7% idle
PID USER PR VIRT NI RES SHR S %CPU TIME+ %MEM COMMAND 1040 mailman 9 42960 0 41m 12m S 0 693:59.44 2.1 ArchRunner:0:1 -s 1041 mailman 9 22876 0 20m 7488 S 0 478:18.62 1.0 BounceRunner:0:1 1045 mailman 9 20412 0 19m 10m S 0 3031:12 0.9 OutgoingRunner:0: 1043 mailman 9 20476 0 18m 4968 S 0 127:02.62 0.9 IncomingRunner:0: 1042 mailman 9 18564 0 17m 7316 S 0 11:34.14 0.9 CommandRunner:0:1 1046 mailman 11 17276 0 15m 10m S 1 66:32.16 0.8 VirginRunner:0:1 1044 mailman 9 11568 0 9964 5184 S 0 12:34.04 0.5 NewsRunner:0:1 -s
And those are the only Python-related processes that show up in the first twenty lines.
-- Brad Knowles <brad@shub-internet.org> LinkedIn Profile: <http://tinyurl.com/y8kpxu>