On 06/17/2016 01:21 PM, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
With AOL it is difficult as they remove the original email address who is complaining, Hotmail is OK and now Yahoo reports get sent to me directly.
AOL's redaction is both overkill and ineffective if you use VERP. I.e, with VERP, the envelope is from LISTNAME-bounces+screenname=aol.com@your.host. This appears in a Sender: and Errors-To: header and the delivery agent's Return-Path: header. In all three cases, AOL 'redacts' this by changing LISTNAME-bounces+screenname=aol.com@your.host to redacted-bounces+screenname=aol.com@your.host. Here are partial headers from an AOL feedback report. All addresses are unchanged from AOL's report except I changed the AOL screen name in the VERPed headers to xxxxx, and deleted the From: address.
Return-Path: <redacted-bounces+xxxxx=aol.com@python.org> Received: from mail.python.org (mail.python.org [188.166.95.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mtaig-mca01.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTPS id 876CD700000AA for <redacted>; Sat, 21 May 2016 16:51:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.python.org (mail1.ams1.psf.io [127.0.0.1]) by mail.python.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3rBxmv4BcRzFqPm for <redacted>; Sat, 21 May 2016 16:51:43 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: ... X-Original-To: redacted@python.org Delivered-To: redacted@mail.python.org Received: from mail.python.org (mail1.ams1.psf.io [127.0.0.1]) by mail.python.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3rBxmP4lrNzFqPm for <redacted@python.org>; Sat, 21 May 2016 16:51:17 -0400 (EDT) ... Received: from mail1.ams1.psf.io (HELO mail.python.org) (127.0.0.1) by mail.python.org with SMTP; 21 May 2016 16:51:17 -0400 Received: from avasout03.plus.net (avasout03.plus.net [84.93.230.244]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.python.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <redacted@python.org>; Sat, 21 May 2016 16:51:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.63] ([80.189.231.201]) by avasout03 with smtp id x8o91s0094MNSaw018oAUk; Sat, 21 May 2016 21:48:11 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=KLCndwxo c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=2lUcMO59U90xkKzxSzK6mw==:117 a=2lUcMO59U90xkKzxSzK6mw==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=sAxD9uHJ85yeiWqiGbQA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 Subject: Re: for / while else doesn't make sense To: redacted@python.org References: <CAHJ7fxhOeKFbu3=Jso=wgpBnH9Opr_J_6SHLDO+KtAqVFeGHnA@mail.gmail.com> redacted@python.org redacted@news.astraweb.com redacted@wintry.unequivocal.co.uk redacted@news.astraweb.com redacted@lucidity.plus.com redacted@python.org redacted@news.astraweb.com From: ... Message-ID: <5740C989.4070408@lucidity.plus.com> Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 21:48:09 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <redacted@news.astraweb.com> X-BeenThere: redacted@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <redacted.python.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/redacted>, redacted@python.org List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/redacted/> List-Post: <mailto:redacted@python.org> List-Help: <mailto:redacted@python.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/redacted>, redacted@python.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: redacted-bounces+xxxxx=aol.com@python.org Sender: "redacted" <redacted-bounces+xxxxx=aol.com@python.org>
-- Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan