From the reports I've received, it looks as if they redact only from the headers. With personalization on, I put a "%(user_address)s" token in the non-digest footer and as of the last report I got (June 8) it came through the feedback loop intact. I've never figured out a similar fix for digests, however, and that seems to be where most of the reports come from. So maybe there's room for a new approach there.
rac
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lindsay Haisley <fmouse@fmp.com> To: mailman-users@python.org Cc: Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:54:34 -0500 Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] AOL redacts user addresses even with VERP and full personalization enabled On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 20:42 -0400, Dave (FitEyes) wrote:
Now that you motivated me, I actually read the blog post too:
http://postmaster-blog.aol.com/2008/08/13/more-on-the-upcoming-feedback-loop...
It now seems pretty clear that we can use these reports in the way Lindsay and others have proposed.
Well if this is so, are they still redacting the VERP recipient addresses?
-- Lindsay Haisley | "We are all broken toasters, but we still FMP Computer Services | manage to make toast" 512-259-1190 | http://www.fmp.com | - Cheryl Dehut