June 29, 2009
8:52 p.m.
On Jun 29, 2009, at 9:47 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
(Sorry, forgot to include this.)
On 6/29/2009 8:10 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
If it's replying to message with a Precedence: header (and any
value) it's broken.You may want to take a look at section 3.9, "Quality information" of
RFC 2076 (http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2076.txt).
Sure, Precedence may be discouraged, but it's pretty common practice.
-Barry