-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 7:21 PM +0000 2006-07-26, Jon Loose wrote: [...]
Second, my previous install of mailman was 2.1.x running under /usr/local/mailman. I note that the fedora installation already seems to have mailman files distributed around the filesystem. Is there a standard installation now as part of fedora, and am I better to use this or stick with a fresh installation into /usr/local/mailman?
They've done whatever they've done and didn't ask for any involvement from us.
That doesn't seem entirely fair to the Red Hat/Fedora folks. John Dennis of Red Hat very clearly solicited comment on these changes on mailman-developers back in Oct 2004 and submitted a patch as well[1].
I agree with pretty much everything else though. :-)
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers@python.org/msg08110.html
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
If quizzes are quizzical, what are tests?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: When crypto is outlawed bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
iQFDBAEBAgAtBQJEyCNiJhhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnBvYm94LmNvbS9+dG16L3BncC90 bXouYXNjAAoJEEMlk4u+rwzj4WgIAK5klg6qK7JB1f09kFTmmLwieOb6iT+JgJtq XFsJQz4jTispyUOYhr9FaR3/oYAAZOdItwpQMmc7iZjl2S7B4tlHMtWvFVCJgAvU xKuKSV0+UaWgjwnPAgDjsOmP9K9LS6OzFVHUylNR9p6GUU9PLwGtnP+QSspj52Ao ODEoEW/1B3rRPjoOanJ0gzlWVdvdawO0j/KD3ktsrwLqRZqCQ11XYWYgtSVEg9jt CWTK3zEnLMDuYT57DZOTc8h9HLbJTiJuaecCBCVAKD3fodO7F/5cUnxWyZGnWf++ Aa0sicRSGNjiYmJFchstfuMebN2i7AvvhuYMhiE349n4E0N7R1s= =9ixw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----