On 7/17/19 5:50 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
Here is a sample of one semi-regular bounce I get from a list I manage (I haved X'ed out the personal information included in the bounce). I suspect that one issue is that this is a bounce message, not a server refusing (thus they are probably back-scattering), and the bounce doesn't give the address that the message was sent to (though it is in the Delivered-To: header of the message that bounced that I trimmed).
Also, being a 'I think your a spammer' as opposed to 'That address isn't valid' message says I am not sure one really wants to count it as a bounce.
Yes, that is tricky, but assuming we do, I have some questions.
...
Subject: failure notice In-Reply-To: <mailman.1670.1561691523.13590.arlington@arlingtonlist.org> References: <mailman.1670.1561691523.13590.arlington@arlingtonlist.org>
These are Mailman generated Message-IDs indicating the message is some kind of Mailman generated notice and not a list post. Are they all like that or are some of them list posts?
Hi. This is the bounce program. I'm afraid I've been instructed to return your message. It was refused by the recipient's junk mail controls.
To reach XXXXXXXXXXX, please telephone +1 888 XXXXXXX.
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
I could recognize this in simplematch <https://gitlab.com/warsaw/flufl.bounce/blob/master/flufl/bounce/_detectors/s...> with a start regexp of
^.*This is the bounce program. I'm afraid I've been instructed
and an address regexp of
^Delivered-To:\s*(?P<addr>[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+)\s*$')
-- Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan