On 2017-10-01 22:23, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 9/29/2017 11:34 AM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
(mailman 2.1.12 on centos 6.9)
I don't think that Mark mentioned it, but 2.1.12 is -painfully- old (as is centos 6.9) and centos packages often lag way behind the corresponding source versions.
If you need to stick with 6.9, I would consider ditching the centos package and installing the current mailman from source. Otherwise, can you move to a more modern Linux and more recent mailman?
Mailman's been been trouble- and maintenance-free for us since we switched from whatever-that-perl-thing-was-called all those years ago, and it never occurred to me it'd something as silly as abort the running op because my browser timed out. Now that I know, I'll consider "upgrading" -- to the university-run lyris: I might as well outsource the whole thing.
Dima