Hello.
I'm new at this list.
I'm trying to setup a list (I'm not the site admin), and I'd like to use Munge From setting, but I'd like not have Reply-To field or CC field, but I suspect is not possible.
I was testing with anonymous_list, but the problem is that only a certain member should send some kind of calls, but with anonymous_list anyone could send it.
I'm setting up with 2.1.23 version.
Regards and thanks in advanced and sorry for my bad english
On 3/16/21 9:54 AM, Diez wrote:
I'm trying to setup a list (I'm not the site admin), and I'd like to use Munge From setting, but I'd like not have Reply-To field or CC field, but I suspect is not possible.
One of the goals of Munge From is that for conformant MUAs (whatever that means because the RFC only suggests these behaviors), the behavior of reply and reply all should be consistent regardless of whether the From: is munged or not. That is why when the Form: is munged, the posters address is put in a Reply-To: or Cc: header.
There is no setting other than anonymous list to not do this.
I was testing with anonymous_list, but the problem is that only a certain member should send some kind of calls, but with anonymous_list anyone could send it.
I do not understand. Moderation and moderation actions still apply to the poster even if the list is anonymous.
-- Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
El mar, 16-03-2021 a las 15:28 -0700, Mark Sapiro escribió:
On 3/16/21 9:54 AM, Diez wrote:
I'm trying to setup a list (I'm not the site admin), and I'd like to use Munge From setting, but I'd like not have Reply-To field or CC field, but I suspect is not possible.
One of the goals of Munge From is that for conformant MUAs (whatever that means because the RFC only suggests these behaviors), the behavior of reply and reply all should be consistent regardless of whether the From: is munged or not. That is why when the Form: is munged, the posters address is put in a Reply-To: or Cc: header.
There is no setting other than anonymous list to not do this.
I was testing with anonymous_list, but the problem is that only a certain member should send some kind of calls, but with anonymous_list anyone could send it.
I do not understand. Moderation and moderation actions still apply to the poster even if the list is anonymous.
It would enough for me even I'll need a moderator. The initial idea was get a list for an organization so members can't see email addresses of the others and only one member (let's say the owner) was allowed to send some contents, and preferably without the need for a moderator (Law of least effort :-)). With this scenario, any member could falsify a content corresponding to the moderator and send it, all the headers would be the same, but activating moderation we could detect these cases.
Thank you
Diez writes:
The initial idea was get a list for an organization so members can't see email addresses of the others
This is what anonymous list does.
and only one member (let's say the owner) was allowed to send some contents,
This is what Privacy Options | Sender Filters is for. They are independent of each other. I think that setting
default_member_moderation: Yes
and if there are permitted posters who are not members of the list:
accept_these_nonmembers: <addresses of allowed posters>
and in Membership Management | Membership List, set Mod to true for everyone (there's an Additional Member Task for this at the bottom of the page), then unset Mod for the allowed posters (if they are members).
and preferably without the need for a moderator (Law of least effort :-)).
For this, in Privacy Options | Sender Filters set
member_moderation_action: reject (or discard, if members won't bug you about posts they're not supposed to make that "disappear")
With this scenario, any member could falsify a content corresponding to the moderator and send it,
There's no difference between a regular list and an anonymous list; they'll get caught either way. If you're worried about technically sophisticated rascals, we can help you make sending fake mails to the list much harder for them, but as I say, there's no difference in this between regular lists and anonymous lists -- it's the way the mail system works.
Steve
On 3/17/21 5:49 AM, Diez wrote:
With this scenario, any member could falsify a content corresponding to the moderator and send it, all the headers would be the same, but activating moderation we could detect these cases.
See the "How to restrict the list so only authorized persons can post:" section and the "more secure alternative" method in the "How to post to the announcement list:"section at <https://wiki.list.org/x/4030685>.
-- Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
I would like to censor terms or words in emails, is there a way to do so? all I see in Filtering is content types.
Thanks, Vako
On 3/21/21 1:16 PM, Jonathan M wrote:
On 21 Mar 2021, at 17:09, Vako Nicolian <vako@varnitec.com> wrote:
I would like to censor terms or words in emails, is there a way to do so?
You could use Privacy Options... Spam Filters.
Best wishes
Jonathan
Which can filter on the headers of the message (like the subject) but not the body of the message.
-- Richard Damon
On 3/21/21 10:00 AM, Vako Nicolian wrote:
I would like to censor terms or words in emails, is there a way to do so? all I see in Filtering is content types.
Mailman has no settings to filter based on the content of text in the message body. That should be handled by something like SpamAssassin before the mail ever gets to Mailman.
-- Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
Mailman 2 sends emails in BCC to moderation. Is there a setting to disable this option and have it approved immediately?
Thanks, Vako Nicolian
On 2/22/22 09:26, Vako Nicolian wrote:
Mailman 2 sends emails in BCC to moderation. Is there a setting to disable this option and have it approved immediately?
Set Privacy options... -> Recipient filters -> require_explicit_destination to No
-- Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
participants (6)
-
Diez -
Jonathan M -
Mark Sapiro -
Richard Damon -
Stephen J. Turnbull -
Vako Nicolian