RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman/htdig problem
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09311/093111e6db10b3a10b064fbc38818b203c053291" alt=""
At 14:06 30/04/2003, Timothy Arnold wrote:
Hi Richard,
Thanks for this. I followed the instructions detailed in Operational Information in the install notes and it now had created the indicies. However, mmsearch still fails when I try to conduct a search.
Mmsearch reports:
Htdgi Archives Access Failure
Search failed -12-
The messages that I reported last time are still being reported in the syslog. Any ideas what -12- means?
Further to my earlier suggestions, you can try running htsearch from the command line and seeing how it responds. Try the following command:
<path-to-htsearch> -c $prefix/archives/htdig/<listname>.conf
answer the prompt for words with some words to seach for
answer the format as short
What happens? If all is well you should get back a HTTP response Content-type header of text/html, followed by a bunch of HTML, this being the search results.
In total, if my earlier suggestion of the test script returns the correct results, and running htsearch from the command line returns the correct results, then you should not have a problem. Let us hope we do not end up with that contradiction to deal with.
Thanks, Tim.
-----Original Message----- From: Richard Barrett [mailto:R.Barrett@ftel.co.uk] Sent: 30 April 2003 13:51 To: Timothy Arnold; mailman-users@python.org Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman/htdig problem
At 11:18 30/04/2003, Timothy Arnold wrote:
Hiya,
I have recently installed mailman 2.1.2 with the relevent htdig patches and I still cannot get it to work.
For a given list, the search box is displayed and the configuration file for the list is generated but the search funtionality doesn't work
- I look in the error log and I find
Apr 30 10:56:39 2003 (12488) htsearch for list: test5, existatus: 1 Apr 30 10:56:39 2003 (12488) htsearch for list: test5, cause: htsearch, detail: -12-
On the archive page, it reports that the search index has yet to be built - do I need to run nightly_htdig for each list when it is created?
Until nightly_htdig is first run there will be no per-list htdig search indexes for htsearch to use. It is usually a good idea to send an initial message to a list which is being archived, which will cause htdig to be setup for the list (per-list htdig.conf created and search form added to the list's TOC page), and then run nightly_htdig from the command line (as the mailman uid) to generate an initial set of htdig indexes for the list.
Just copy the command for running nightly_htdig in the modified mailman crontab generated by the htdig integration patch
Bear in mind that, in common with most search engines, htdig does not search the web pages when a user submits a search query; rather some part of the search engine's suite of programs (rundig in the case of htdig) builds search indexes for the material and it is from these indexes that a user's search query is satisfied. That is also why the search form has the date/time indexing was last run for the list embedded in it with the caution that more recent archive material will not be found.
btw: this issue is covered in the third paragraph under the heading "Operational Information" in INSTALL.htdig-mm.
Thanks, Tim.
-- Timothy Arnold, Server & Network Infrastructure Support Officer, Internet Services, Becta, Coventry, CV4 7JJ, UK Voice: +44 24 7684 7169 email: timothy.arnold@becta.org.uk Fax: +44 24 7641 1418
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com
participants (1)
-
Richard Barrett