Re: [Mailman-Users] Backing up Mailman list installations
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 02:09:17 -0500 Jon Carnes <jonc@haht.com> wrote:
Cool scripts.
Hacks really.
I used to do something similar, and then I moved over to using "ncftp" to drop the tarball off on my backup-server. A matter of preference, but I like that better than mailing myself the tarball.
Originally I kept the tarballs as versioned files in a ZOO archive. I didn't like this as ZOO suffers as a tool and there was no distribution.
Then I used to SSH/scp the tarballs to myself on another system. I didn't like this as it required that the tool that did the file copy must be able to authenticate itself on the other system (ie SSH public key authentication). I didn't like that as compromise of the local system thereby implied compromise of the the other system as well (or at least questions of untrusted shell access). Not good.
No I mail them. No trust models required other than the fact that I'm implicitly exposing the tarballs en-route to interception, and thus the password/membership base as well. Well, that would be a problem except that the root account on that box delivers to a local mbox which I collect over an IMAP-SSL connection (the wonders of fetchmail).
So, I get a decent trust model *and* distribution.
--
J C Lawrence
---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
claw@kanga.nu He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, J C Lawrence wrote:
[S]o I mail them. No trust models required other than the fact that I'm implicitly exposing the tarballs en-route to interception, and thus the password/membership base as well. Well, that would be a problem except that the root account on that box delivers to a local mbox which I collect over an IMAP-SSL connection (the wonders of fetchmail).
So, I get a decent trust model *and* distribution.
Dale Newfield <Dale@Newfield.org>
"My country, right or wrong" is not a cogent argument. It is one step away from "I was only following orders."
Sorry for this double intrusion, but I must apologize for the first unintentional one. I had intended to cancel that composition instead of sending it--sorry for filling your mailboxes with messages empty of content.
-Dale Newfield Dale@Newfield.org
participants (2)
-
Dale Newfield
-
J C Lawrence