Fran Le Bouleix wrote:

I have a problem with one of my lists:

The list is set up to send replies to a Specific address: name@listname.com When the owner sends a message to the list, the reply-to headers are set to both the list address (listname@lists101.his.com) + the specific adress (name@listname.com)

I asked the owner to send a copy of the message she is sending to the list, and here is what we have:

• headers of the message sent directly to us:

User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913 Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:15:38 -0400 Subject: Oprah/10 Rites/Virginia Update/Texas Campaign/Kentucky survey - 10/04 From: List Name=?ISO-8859-1?B?riA=?=<name@listname.com> To: listname=?ISO-8859-1?B?riA=?=List <listname@lists101.his.com> CC: Heller <support@his.com> Message-ID: <BDA5DC9A.B4AB%name@listname.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"

• headers of the message received as a list member:

User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913 Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:15:38 -0400 To: listname=?ISO-8859-1?B?riA=?=List <listname@lists101.his.com> Message-ID: <BDA5DC9A.B4AB%name@listname.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by lists101.his.com id i9S3Dkdv099476 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:20:19 -0400 Cc: Heller <support@his.com> From: listname@lists101.his.com Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5Blistname=AE=5D_?= Oprah/10 Rites/Virginia Update/Texas Campaign/Kentucky survey - 10/04 X-BeenThere: listname@lists101.his.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3 Precedence: list Reply-To: name@listname.com, listname@lists101.his.com

<headers below Reply-To: snipped>

And the list config says:

# legal values are: # 0 = "Poster" # 1 = "This list" # 2 = "Explicit address" reply_goes_to_list = 2

reply_to_address = 'name@listname.com'

Where does the second reply-to address comes from when the email is sent via Mailman???? Any Mailman variable I should check?

What is the setting for first_strip_reply_to? This should be Yes (or 1). If it is set to No, the explicit reply to will be added to the incoming Reply-To: instead of replacing it.

I know the message you received directly doesn't show a Reply-To:, but th list message has an X-Mailman-Approved-At: header indicating it went through an approval process. Maybe a Reply-To: got added there.

In any case, make sure that first_strip_reply_to is Yes, and if it wasn't, I think that will fix the problem.

-- Mark Sapiro <msapiro@value.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan