feature suggestion for digest mode ?
I have elected to receive the majority of the mailing lists I am subscribed to in mime digest mode (actually all the lists who support such a mode, which incidentally means all mailman-managed ones).
Recently there was a discussion on the alpine lists about ways to automatically trigger (as an user preference in the MTA, not as a list preference in mailman or alike) that replies go to the list, not to the poster (I'm one of the 50% of the people who think that a discussion list is made for discussions not for person-to-person replies).
This can be technically implemented in alpine as a role-setting rule triggered by some pattern in the e-mail message one is replying to.
The suggestion was to use List-Id.
However, if one receives from the list as a MIME digest (as I do), and accesses individual Message/RFC822 portions as if it were an individual e-mail (which I do via a key definition rule in alpine), these portions DO NOT CONTAIN ANY of the "list management keywords".
I guess a quick workaround for me would be to use the To: field instead of List-Id, but I wonder if a future mailman version could consider a way to include the "list management keywords" in the Message/RFC822 components !
--
Lucio Chiappetti - INAF/IASF - via Bassini 15 - I-20133 Milano (Italy) For more info : http://www.iasf-milano.inaf.it/~lucio/personal.html
Wir muessen wissen / wir werden wissen Inscription on David Hilbert's grave http://tinyurl.com/3e5hfl
Lucio Chiappetti writes:
I guess a quick workaround for me would be to use the To: field instead of List-Id, but I wonder if a future mailman version could consider a way to include the "list management keywords" in the Message/RFC822 components !
This wouldn't be hard to do, I think, but an alternative would be for the MUA to provide a way for messages from an "exploded" digest to inherit (some) headers from the digest. This would work even for lists that don't provide the new feature, and might have some other benefits (ie, for other header fields) as well.
Of course if the exploder is a separate program, it would have to actually edit the exploded messages, but if it's integrated into the MUA, these headers could be supplied as attributes on the (internal) message object.
participants (2)
-
Lucio Chiappetti
-
Stephen J. Turnbull