Hi,
I've just been through my mailman lists handling the held postings, and I notice that mailman is playing silly buggers with the web interface. Please see:
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/images/mailmangroupings.jpgI'm rapidly loosing confidence in Mailman as a decent piece of secure software, especially as my attempts to report previous bugs/add them to the sourceforge bug manager go totally unacknowledged for MONTHS. In fact, I've NEVER had any acknowledgement from the mailman developers for ANYTHING. I'm expecting this one to be handled the same way, so I don't suppose it matters whatever I put in this email.
Since I can't wait around for months while no one even responds to something like this, I've handled those pending messages the best I can, so consider any data mailman had lost.
Thanks.
-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 03:43:01PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
Hi,
I've just been through my mailman lists handling the held postings, and I notice that mailman is playing silly buggers with the web interface. Please see:
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/images/mailmangroupings.jpg
I've had this too. While I didn't inspect the HTML, I thought it was a mozilla bug and not a mailman one
I'm rapidly loosing confidence in Mailman as a decent piece of secure software, especially as my attempts to report previous bugs/add them to the sourceforge bug manager go totally unacknowledged for MONTHS. In
It is unfortunate, but Barry is not very good at looking at the SF bugs and patches. Mail on mailman-developers and his day job keep him busy enough.
Marc
Microsoft is to operating systems & security .... .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger marc_f@merlins.org for PGP key
At 03:43 PM 3/28/02 +0000, Russell King wrote:
Hi,
I've just been through my mailman lists handling the held postings, and I notice that mailman is playing silly buggers with the web interface. Please see:
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/images/mailmangroupings.jpg
What's the issue? The funny characters in subject? That message claims to be in the ks_c_5601_1987 character set, which is probably an oriental set. It's not displaying right in 7bit ascii. 2.1 would probably handle it much better, unless the html the person was sending you claiming one charset and using another.
The dev team has been slow about dealing with 2.0 issues because all the energy is going to 2.1 right now, which is in beta.
participants (3)
-
Marc MERLIN -
Ron Jarrell -
Russell King