Re: [Mailman-Users] resend - mailman 2.1.21 - dmarc check problem
Mark,
Sorry for the duplicate.
In message <572AA8E4.9070405@msapiro.net> Mark Sapiro writes:
On 05/04/2016 09:27 AM, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
I'm resending this with a new subject. The last email just disappeared (no bounce). Maybe having DMARC_ORGANIZATIONAL_DOMAIN_DATA_URL in the subject tripped an all caps in subject test. (Or the moderator is slacking?)
A moderator (me) approved your post and cleared your mod bit approximately 2 hours before you posted this. My reply to that post is at <https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2016-May/080772.html>.
I don't know why you didn't receive it. It was successfully sent per
May 4 10:36:04 mail postfix/smtp[22778]: 3r0LDW0F1DzFqP0: to=<curtis@ipv6.occnc.com>, relay=mta2-em1.orleans.occnc.com[50.252.223.140]:25, delay=42, delays=0.08/0/31/11, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 316BF9DDA)
(time stamp is UTC - 0400)
Odd that is says 10:36. The URL in the archive says Wed May 4 21:29:26 EDT 2016 which matches mail headers.
Maybe the ALL CAPS filtered it at your end.
I got the reply. I just didn't get any "held by moderator" so wasn't sure if my first mail went into a black hole. Did one get sent?
Mail crossed. Your mail was sent (according to mail headers) at:
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 18:29:26 -0700
My duplicate was sent on:
Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 12:27:24 -0400
which is 15:27 in -0700 land. My duplicate was sent 3 hours before your reply.
In any case, sorry for the duplicate. If this was a "first time only" moderator action, then it can't happen again.
Either way I appologize for being impatient.
Curtis
-- Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
On 05/05/2016 04:31 PM, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
Mark,
Sorry for the duplicate.
In message <572AA8E4.9070405@msapiro.net> Mark Sapiro writes:
On 05/04/2016 09:27 AM, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
I'm resending this with a new subject. The last email just disappeared (no bounce). Maybe having DMARC_ORGANIZATIONAL_DOMAIN_DATA_URL in the subject tripped an all caps in subject test. (Or the moderator is slacking?)
A moderator (me) approved your post and cleared your mod bit approximately 2 hours before you posted this. My reply to that post is at <https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2016-May/080772.html>.
I don't know why you didn't receive it. It was successfully sent per
May 4 10:36:04 mail postfix/smtp[22778]: 3r0LDW0F1DzFqP0: to=<curtis@ipv6.occnc.com>, relay=mta2-em1.orleans.occnc.com[50.252.223.140]:25, delay=42, delays=0.08/0/31/11, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 316BF9DDA)
(time stamp is UTC - 0400)
Odd that is says 10:36. The URL in the archive says Wed May 4 21:29:26 EDT 2016 which matches mail headers.
Look at the X-Mailman-Approved-At: header.
Maybe the ALL CAPS filtered it at your end.
I got the reply. I just didn't get any "held by moderator" so wasn't sure if my first mail went into a black hole. Did one get sent?
No. We don't send them. They create spam backscatter.
Mail crossed. Your mail was sent (according to mail headers) at:
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 18:29:26 -0700
My duplicate was sent on:
Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 12:27:24 -0400
which is 15:27 in -0700 land. My duplicate was sent 3 hours before your reply.
Agreed, but your original was approved and delivered to the list at 10:35 -0400, almost two hours before your follow-up was sent.
In any case, sorry for the duplicate. If this was a "first time only" moderator action, then it can't happen again.
Either way I appologize for being impatient.
Apology accepted. No problem. And your mod bit is now cleared so it was a one time thing.
-- Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
participants (2)
-
Curtis Villamizar -
Mark Sapiro