Hi all. I have switched on the filter on all my lists. I have only set it to filter and convert HTML to plain text, all other settings are default. In the general settings for all lists, I have set reply-to "this list" instead of sender. I only want replies go to the list, not to the members directly.
The rpely-to stuff worked just fine before I switched on the filters. But now, some mails from the list don't have the reply-to-header. It looks to me that mails that has been converted from HTML don't get the reply-to-header. Others emails has the header. Are there any solutions on this?
Thanks in advance.
--
Joakim Nomell Phn: +46 70 771 31 00 MSN : joakim@nomell.nu Unix engineer Fax: +46 70 711 31 00 Web : http://nomell.se
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Joakim Nomell wrote:
Hi all. I have switched on the filter on all my lists. I have only set it to filter and convert HTML to plain text, all other settings are default. In the general settings for all lists, I have set reply-to "this list" instead of sender. I only want replies go to the list, not to the members directly.
The rpely-to stuff worked just fine before I switched on the filters. But now, some mails from the list don't have the reply-to-header. It looks to me that mails that has been converted from HTML don't get the reply-to-header. Others emails has the header. Are there any solutions on this?
Thanks in advance.
Correction, the reply-to-header is not missing (my Pine didn't show it). it looks like this in some cases:
Reply-To: User user@domain.se, Hackerlistan hacker@smartlist.nu
--
Joakim Nomell Phn: +46 70 771 31 00 MSN : joakim@nomell.nu Unix engineer Fax: +46 70 711 31 00 Web : http://nomell.se
- When seeking love gives nothing, have found love gives all *
At 12:24 PM +0100 2005-02-24, Joakim Nomell wrote:
Correction, the reply-to-header is not missing (my Pine didn't show it). it looks like this in some cases:
Reply-To: User user@domain.se, Hackerlistan hacker@smartlist.nu
This means that the mailing list has added it's e-mail address to the list of addresses to which a reply should be sent. In this case, it was folded onto the next line, but it should still be valid.
This seems to be working fine to me.-- Brad Knowles, brad@stop.mail-abuse.org
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755SAGE member since 1995. See http://www.sage.org/ for more info.
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 12:24 PM +0100 2005-02-24, Joakim Nomell wrote:
Correction, the reply-to-header is not missing (my Pine didn't show it). it looks like this in some cases:
Reply-To: User user@domain.se, Hackerlistan hacker@smartlist.nu
This means that the mailing list has added it's e-mail address to the list of addresses to which a reply should be sent. In this case, it was folded onto the next line, but it should still be valid.
This seems to be working fine to me.
If you don't want this behavior, i.e. if you wan't to throw away the OP's Reply-To:, set first_strip_reply_to to Yes.
-- Mark Sapiro msapiro@value.net The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
participants (3)
-
Brad Knowles -
Joakim Nomell -
Mark Sapiro