RE: [Mailman-Users] Attachments not at end + archive
Yes, using MIME digests...However, will the attachments still be available. Some come as non-text, and I need to have the attachments available.
Thanks, Anthony
-----Original Message----- From: Brad Knowles [mailto:brad.knowles@skynet.be] Sent: 31 July 2003 17:02 To: CARTER Anthony Cc: 'mailman-users@python.org' Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments not at end + archive
At 4:38 PM +0200 2003/07/31, CARTER Anthony wrote:
You're using MIME format digests, right? Have you tried turningthat off?
-- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+ !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++) tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
At 5:11 PM +0200 2003/07/31, CARTER Anthony wrote:
Yes, using MIME digests...However, will the attachments still be available. Some come as non-text, and I need to have the attachments available.
I'm not sure how attachments would be handled in non-MIME format. I would be interested to know what would happen.
I suspect that attachments would not be handled well in non-MIME format, and that the only solution to your problem is to modify the mailman digestifier code so that it uses inline MIME multipart/mixed bodyparts, but I don't know what it would take to make it do that.
Certainly, many incoming messages might have to be changed (since on a per-message basis, having all the attachments at the bottom shouldn't be a problem). This would most likely break PGP signed messages, and I'm not sure what might happen to others.
-- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+ !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++) tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
At 5:11 PM +0200 2003/07/31, CARTER Anthony wrote:
Yes, using MIME digests...However, will the attachments still be available. Some come as non-text, and I need to have the attachments available.
I'm not sure how attachments would be handled in non-MIME format. I would be interested to know what would happen.
I suspect that attachments would not be handled well in non-MIME format, and that the only solution to your problem is to modify the mailman digestifier code so that it uses inline MIME multipart/mixed bodyparts, but I don't know what it would take to make it do that.
Certainly, many incoming messages might have to be changed (since on a per-message basis, having all the attachments at the bottom shouldn't be a problem). This would most likely break PGP signed messages, and I'm not sure what might happen to others.
-- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+ !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++) tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
participants (2)
-
Brad Knowles -
CARTER Anthony