How to create two lists with same name, but different domain name and different users ?
regards
-- "Paciência é a virtude que abre o caminho para as demais"
============================== Guilherme Funchal da Silva .`.
On samedi 06 octobre 2007, Guilherme Funchal wrote:
How to create two lists with same name, but different domain name and different users ?
By using the -e option of the new_list command?
-- Frédéric
On 10/6/07, Guilherme Funchal wrote:
How to create two lists with same name, but different domain name and different users ?
Search the FAQ Wizard for "virtual domain hosting".
-- Brad Knowles <brad@shub-internet.org> LinkedIn Profile: <http://tinyurl.com/y8kpxu>
Guilherme,
In the current version of Mailman you cannot create a list with the same name on multiple domains.
Or to be more specific, each server has a single "namespace" for mailing lists - independent of domain name.
One method to get around this is to append the domain name to the list name to make it unique.
In Service,
Michael Kabot President - SOAR Scouting Online Affordable & Reliable mkabot@soarol.com 585-388-0211
www.soarol.com
| | On 10/6/07, Guilherme Funchal wrote: | | > How to create two lists with same name, but different domain name | and | > different users ? | | Search the FAQ Wizard for "virtual domain hosting". |
Ok... very basic question but I cannot find an answer anywhere. I've been through the documentation, the FAQ, done a few Google searches - nothing.
If you turn bounce processing OFF on a mailman list - where do bounce messages go? Back to the sender, to the moderator, both, neither?
Thanks in advance,
Mike Kabot
Michael Kabot wrote:
If you turn bounce processing OFF on a mailman list - where do bounce messages go? Back to the sender, to the moderator, both, neither?
If bounce processing is off for a list, mail to the list-bounces address is not processed at all. It is completely ignored.
The 'Details for bounce_processing' link puts it this way "By setting this value to No, you disable all automatic bounce processing for this list, however bounce messages will still be discarded so that the list administrator isn't inundated with them."
-- Mark Sapiro <msapiro@value.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
Mark,
Thanks! Surprise, right there but I didn't see it.
Is there anyway to turn the bounce processing score feature off, prevent bounces from going back to list members, but still have bounce messages go the list owner?
Mike
| -----Original Message----- | From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:msapiro@value.net] | Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 2:03 AM | To: mkabot@soarol.com; Mailman-Users@python.org | Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Basic bounce processing question | | Michael Kabot wrote: | > | >If you turn bounce processing OFF on a mailman list - where do bounce | >messages go? Back to the sender, to the moderator, both, neither? | | | If bounce processing is off for a list, mail to the list-bounces | address is not processed at all. It is completely ignored. | | The 'Details for bounce_processing' link puts it this way "By setting | this value to No, you disable all automatic bounce processing for this | list, however bounce messages will still be discarded so that the list | administrator isn't inundated with them." | | -- | Mark Sapiro <msapiro@value.net> The highway is for gamblers, | San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
Michael Kabot wrote:
Is there anyway to turn the bounce processing score feature off, prevent bounces from going back to list members, but still have bounce messages go the list owner?
You do this in the MTA. If the MTA has an alias like:
listname-bounces: "|/path/to/mail/mailman bounces listname"
You change it to
listname-bounces: "|/path/to/mail/mailman owner listname"
If the MTA uses some other kind of routing for Mailman, you do the equivalent thing.
Note that bounces from RFC compliant MTAs will always be returned to the listname-bounces address (the envelope sender). That address is also put in Sender: and Errors-To: headers in the outgoing mail to help non-compliant MTAs get it right. Still, there are non-compliant MTAs that will return bounces to the From: or other header address. There's nothing Mailman can do about that.
-- Mark Sapiro <msapiro@value.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
Follow up question on the below suggestion.
In this configuration if a user replies, they will be replying to the -bounces address which will then send email to the Admin - not the entire list?
How do I configure the list to use the "basename", without the -bounces, in the Sender: field?
Thanks,
Mike
| -----Original Message----- | From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:msapiro@value.net] | Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 11:31 AM | To: mkabot@soarol.com; Mailman-Users@python.org | Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Basic bounce processing question | | Michael Kabot wrote: | > | >Is there anyway to turn the bounce processing score feature off, | prevent | >bounces from going back to list members, but still have bounce | messages go | >the list owner? | | | You do this in the MTA. If the MTA has an alias like: | | listname-bounces: "|/path/to/mail/mailman bounces listname" | | You change it to | | listname-bounces: "|/path/to/mail/mailman owner listname" | | If the MTA uses some other kind of routing for Mailman, you do the | equivalent thing. | | Note that bounces from RFC compliant MTAs will always be returned to | the listname-bounces address (the envelope sender). That address is | also put in Sender: and Errors-To: headers in the outgoing mail to | help non-compliant MTAs get it right. Still, there are non-compliant | MTAs that will return bounces to the From: or other header address. | There's nothing Mailman can do about that. | | -- | Mark Sapiro <msapiro@value.net> The highway is for gamblers, | San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
Michael Kabot wrote:
Follow up question on the below suggestion.
In this configuration if a user replies, they will be replying to the -bounces address which will then send email to the Admin - not the entire list?
Not if their MUA does what it is supposed to do. Replies should go to the From: overridden by Reply-To:, not to the Sender:.
This is no different than the ordinary case where the -bounces address is used for automated bounce processing.
How do I configure the list to use the "basename", without the -bounces, in the Sender: field?
If you really want to, see <http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq02.003.htp>.
-- Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
participants (6)
-
Brad Knowles -
Frédéric Mantegazza -
Guilherme Funchal -
Mark Sapiro -
Mark Sapiro -
Michael Kabot