Attempting to update Mailman, but qfiles/* has files

Note, running Debian Stable on the server.
I'm attempting to update Mailman through aptitude, but it warns me that all files in the qfiles tree will be wiped out. This includes files that have been bouncing back and forth between qfiles/out and qfiles/retry. It's not quite clear as to when these messages have landed there.
Moreover, I noted that I have a good sized stack of messages in qfiles/bad - which I'm not too worried about, since the dates are pretty old.
In short, what is the best way to proceed, given the circumstances?
-Dennis

Dennis Carr wrote:
Move the files from qfiles/retry aside somewhere. You may need to do this more than once if files have been moved from retry to out for processing and haven't finished.
See the posts at <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2011-April/071484.html> and <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2011-April/071486.html> for information about the qfiles/bad entries. You can move these aside too if you wish, or just look at them in place, or ignore them.
Look at the files from the retry queue with 'bin/dumpdb -p'. This will show you the message and the metadata. The metadata contains the undelivered recipient list. If the addresses are in fact bad, you can just ignore that file, but you might want to consider whether you want your MTA to be returning a retryable status for these addresses. (Hint: if this is Postfix, you may want to set 'unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550' in main.cf.)
If there are any you want to keep from qfiles/retry, you can move them back after the upgrade.
There is no point in moving back any qfiles/bad files as they have only been saved for forensic analysis and nothing further will be done with them by Mailman.
-- Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

On 04/28/11 19:04, Dennis Carr wrote:
I had a problem with qfiles/bad the last time I tried to update. After research, I determined that those files were old and could be deleted. I now run a cron every morning to tell me what is in qfiles/bad so that I can research and handle before they cause problems.
--
Barry S. Finkel Computing and Information Systems Division Argonne National Laboratory Phone: +1 (630) 252-7277 9700 South Cass Avenue Facsimile:+1 (630) 252-4601 Building 240, Room 5.B.8 Internet: BSFinkel@anl.gov Argonne, IL 60439-4828 IBMMAIL: I1004994

Barry Finkel wrote:
It seems that whenever you upgraded Mailman from pre-2.1.11 to 2.1.11 or later, you didn't update Mailman's crontab to run the cron/cull_bad_shunt job.
See <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2011-April/071486.html>.
-- Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

Dennis Carr wrote:
Move the files from qfiles/retry aside somewhere. You may need to do this more than once if files have been moved from retry to out for processing and haven't finished.
See the posts at <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2011-April/071484.html> and <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2011-April/071486.html> for information about the qfiles/bad entries. You can move these aside too if you wish, or just look at them in place, or ignore them.
Look at the files from the retry queue with 'bin/dumpdb -p'. This will show you the message and the metadata. The metadata contains the undelivered recipient list. If the addresses are in fact bad, you can just ignore that file, but you might want to consider whether you want your MTA to be returning a retryable status for these addresses. (Hint: if this is Postfix, you may want to set 'unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550' in main.cf.)
If there are any you want to keep from qfiles/retry, you can move them back after the upgrade.
There is no point in moving back any qfiles/bad files as they have only been saved for forensic analysis and nothing further will be done with them by Mailman.
-- Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

On 04/28/11 19:04, Dennis Carr wrote:
I had a problem with qfiles/bad the last time I tried to update. After research, I determined that those files were old and could be deleted. I now run a cron every morning to tell me what is in qfiles/bad so that I can research and handle before they cause problems.
--
Barry S. Finkel Computing and Information Systems Division Argonne National Laboratory Phone: +1 (630) 252-7277 9700 South Cass Avenue Facsimile:+1 (630) 252-4601 Building 240, Room 5.B.8 Internet: BSFinkel@anl.gov Argonne, IL 60439-4828 IBMMAIL: I1004994

Barry Finkel wrote:
It seems that whenever you upgraded Mailman from pre-2.1.11 to 2.1.11 or later, you didn't update Mailman's crontab to run the cron/cull_bad_shunt job.
See <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2011-April/071486.html>.
-- Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
participants (3)
-
Barry Finkel
-
Dennis Carr
-
Mark Sapiro