Re: [Mailman-Users] Large lists and Postfix
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00ba4/00ba41c9f5a482c0f97a8633b386ba640af51995" alt=""
The load is almost entirely dependent on the mail delivery agent and your network connection, not Mailman. Linux, qmail and smartlist are able to get more than 100,000 messages a day delivered using a '486. This is a reliable, repeatable, every day figure. It should be at least that good for postfix.
Thanks
Bruce
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ed45/3ed45467732cd51b4aac277a0712245d8181a9a7" alt=""
On 16 Mar 1999 bruce@hams.com wrote:
The load is almost entirely dependent on the mail delivery agent and your network connection, not Mailman. Linux, qmail and smartlist are able to get more than 100,000 messages a day delivered using a '486. This is a reliable, repeatable, every day figure. It should be at least that good for postfix.
Thanks. So, considering the claims made about ezmlm for qmail, does that have anything to do with ezmlm, or is it qmail that's making mlm so fast? Would exmlm do just as will using Postfix (if it could), and would qmail work just as well with Mailman instead of ezmlm?
--Dan
Daniel G. Delaney The Louisville Times Chorus Dionysos@Dionysia.org www.LouisvilleTimes.org www.Dionysia.org/~dionysos/ Dionysia Design ICQ Number: 8171285 www.Dionysia.com/design/
"Only two things are infinite: the universe and stupidity--
and I'm not sure about the former."
--Albert Einstein
participants (2)
-
bruceļ¼ hams.com
-
Dan Delaney