Is there any particular reason for not choosing Mailman listnames ending in "-L"? Is there any reason such names should be avoided?
-- Regards, Rod Dav4is / P.O. Box 118 / Hyde Park, NY 12538 / USA Genealogy, et Cetera: http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~dav4is/ 447 ancestral & collateral families, mostly 17°-19° century New England & European roots. Total population: 107,700+ Annex: http://www.gencircles.com/users/dav4is/ email: DAV4IS@YAHOO.COM "It's always something!" -Gilda Radner
Rod Dav4is sent the message below at 14:33 7/27/2006:
Is there any particular reason for not choosing Mailman listnames ending in "-L"? Is there any reason such names should be avoided? ---------------- End original message. ---------------------
It's a convention some people use to designate that an address is a list address and not an address going to a specific person or functional position like a web master or admin.
I don't think Mailman cares one way or another how you name your lists. All it requires is that the list name be valid in the sense that it will resolve to a valid e-mail address.
So what it really comes down to is personal preference. If you like the convention, use it. If not, then don't use it.
Dragon
Venimus, Saltavimus, Bibimus (et naribus canium capti sumus)
participants (2)
-
Dragon
-
Rod Dav4is