On 1 April 2016 at 22:27, qua non <akshayaurora@gmail.com> wrote:

I call bias in how the question is worded. Seriously. I know you mean no harm, but there is no way that this is a fair representation of the issue.

If you want I could reword the question and redo the questionnaire.

The voting is only on this thread done by people who are reading this thread.

They should be aware of what is being talked about.

Shows that people prefer to vote rather than argue as they value their time.

Obviously those who argue here don't vote either as there are "2" votes for not buying out of 16 votes till now.

There comes a point where you can argue however much you want but

majority opinion is majority opinion that's why the vote.

Oh, come on! Now, you are starting to make me worry about intent: Are you actually claiming that there is no evident bias when the choices are labelled:

* Yes, help the community grow!

* No, Community is good as it is

Regards,

Gora

 

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Gora Mohanty <gora@mimirtech.com> wrote:

On 31 March 2016 at 21:05, qua non <akshayaurora@gmail.com> wrote:

ok, folks here is the current state of voting 

If you plan to put your opinion in please vote

I call bias in how the question is worded. Seriously. I know you mean no harm, but there is no way that this is a fair representation of the issue.

Regards,

Gora

_______________________________________________
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ncr-python.in
http://bit.ly/pydelhi-mailinglist-guidelines

_______________________________________________
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ncr-python.in
http://bit.ly/pydelhi-mailinglist-guidelines

_______________________________________________
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ncr-python.in
http://bit.ly/pydelhi-mailinglist-guidelines