On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:16 AM, Gael Varoquaux <gael.varoquaux@normalesup.org> wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 02:13:23AM -0700, Glenn Tarbox, PhD wrote:
>    On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Gael Varoquaux
>    <[1]gael.varoquaux@normalesup.org> wrote:

>      On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 01:31:45AM -0700, Glenn Tarbox, PhD wrote:
>      >      I've been working on some other things lately and that number
>      seemed
>      >      related to 2^32... now that I look more closely, I don't know
>      where that
>      >      number comes from.

>      Is your OS 64bit?

>    Yes, Ubuntu 9.04 x86_64

Hum, I am wondering: could it be that Sage has not been compiled in
64bits? That number '32' seems to me to point toward a 32bit pointer
issue (I may be wrong).

The other tests I posted indicate everything else is working... For example, np.sum(fp) runs over the full set of 1e10 doubes and seems to work fine. 

Also, while my first thought was about 2^32, Chuck Harris's reply kinda put that to bed.  Where 1410065408.0 comes from may involve e or PI (at least thats how we reverse engineered answers when I was in college :-)

-glenn



Gaël

_______________________________________________
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion




--
Glenn H. Tarbox, PhD ||  206-274-6919
http://www.tarbox.org