Fernando Perez wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Gael Varoquaux
wrote: On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 04:20:28PM -0700, Robert Kern wrote:
I'm not sure how it could. It's example code, not part of numpy itself.
OK, maybe I should keep my 2 cents. They appear to be forged money, and worth nothing.
:-).
I *could* make it pyrex/cython-valid, it's trivial but just adds noise IMHO... As Stefan said, pyrex is essentially unmaintained as far as publicly-visible development goes, while cython is very actively moving ahead and likely picking up better numpy support soon (thanks to Dag and other GSoC work), so why not just follow that?
I say just add it. We should move forward with Cython. More important is to see if random actually builds with Cython right now. There was an issue that I recall from a few weeks ago that Cython could not build the pyrex extension in NumPy. -Travis