30 Oct
2009
30 Oct
'09
10:04 a.m.
Robert Kern wrote:
That sounds good. Another worthwhile addition would be nextafter().
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/nextafter.html
Ah, I did not know about this one. I have implemented it and committed it. One issue is that it will cause failures on platforms without nextafterl and where long double != double, but I don't think we have a lot of those, if any, David