On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:11, Charles R Harris
<charlesr.harris@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:56, Charles R Harris
>> <charlesr.harris@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:40, Charles R Harris
>> >> <charlesr.harris@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Hi All,
>> >> >
>> >> > David Cournapeau has mentioned that he would like to have a numpy
>> >> > math
>> >> > library that would supply missing functions and I'm wondering how we
>> >> > should
>> >> > organise the source code. Should we put a mathlib directory in
>> >> > numpy/core/src?
>> >>
>> >> David already did this: numpy/core/src/npymath/
>> >>
>> >
>> > Yeah, but there isn't much low level stuff there and I don't want to
>> > toss a
>> > lot of real numerical code into it.
>>
>> Who cares? I don't.
>
> I care. I want the code to be organized.

Then do it when there is code and we can see what needs to be organized.


I am writing code and I want to decide up front where to put it. I know where you stand, so you need say no more. I'm waiting to see if other folks have an opinion.

Chuck