On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Pauli Virtanen
<pav@iki.fi> wrote:
Hi,
la, 2010-06-26 kello 14:24 +0200, Francesc Alted kirjoitti:
[clip]
> Yeah, you need to explicitly code the support for new functions in numexpr.
> But another possibility, more doable, would be to code the scipy.special
> functions by using numexpr as a computing back-end.
Would it be possible to add generic support for user-supplied ufuncs
into numexpr? This would maybe be more of a convenience feature than a
speed improvement, although perhaps some speed could be gained by
evaluating ufuncs per-block.
--
Pauli Virtanen