2016-10-05 8:45 GMT+02:00 srean <srean.list@gmail.com>:Good discussion, but was surprised by the absence of numexpr in the discussion., given how relevant it (numexpr) is to the topic.Is the goal to fold in the numexpr functionality (and beyond) into Numpy ?Yes, the question about merging numexpr into numpy has been something that periodically shows up in this list. I think mostly everyone agree that it is a good idea, but things are not so easy, and so far nobody provided a good patch for this. Also, the fact that numexpr relies on grouping an expression by using a string (e.g. (y = ne.evaluate("x**3 + tanh(x**2) + 4")) does not play well with the way in that numpy evaluates expressions, so something should be suggested to cope with this too.