On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 22:33, David Cournapeau <david@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp> wrote:
Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris@gmail.com <mailto:charlesr.harris@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com <mailto:robert.kern@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 00:05, David Cournapeau <david@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp <mailto:david@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp>> wrote:
> I think we should just fix it to use conjugate - I will do this in the > branch, and I will integrate it in the trunk later unless someone stands > up vehemently against the change. I opened up a ticket to track this, > though,
It breaks everyone's code that works around the current behavior.
Maybe we need a new function. But what to call it?
How about introducing acorrelate and deprecating the old version?
This does not solve the C function problem (PyArray_Correlate). The easy solution would be to keep the current C version, deal with the problem in python for acorrelate for the time being, and replace the old C function with the 'correct' one once we remove the deprecated correlate ?
No, you do the same thing at the C level. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco