On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Stephan Hoyer <shoyer@gmail.com> wrote:

Sorry, I remain unconvinced (for the reasons that Robert, Nathaniel and myself have already given), but we seem to be talking past each other here.

yeah -- I think it's not clear what the use cases we are talking about are.

I am still -1 on any new string encoding support unless that includes at least UTF-8, with length indicated by the number of bytes.

I've said multiple times that utf-8 support is key to any "exchange binary data" use case (memory mapping?) -- so yes, absolutely.

I _think_ this may be some of the source for the confusion:

The name of this thread is: "proposal: smaller representation of string arrays".

And I got the impression, maybe mistaken, that folks were suggesting that internally encoding strings in numpy as "UTF-8, with length indicated by the number of bytes." was THE solution to the

" the 'U' dtype takes up way too much memory, particularly for mostly-ascii data" problem.

I do not think it is a good solution to that problem.

I think a good solution to that problem is latin-1 encoding. (bear with me here...)

But a bunch of folks have brought up that while we're messing around with string encoding, let's solve another problem:

* Exchanging unicode text at the binary level with other systems that generally don't use UCS-4.

For THAT -- utf-8 is critical.

But if I understand Julian's proposal -- he wants to create a parameterized text dtype that you can set the encoding on, and then numpy will use the encoding (and python's machinery) to encode / decode when passing to/from python strings.

It seems this would support all our desires:

I'd get a latin-1 encoded type for compact representation of mostly-ascii data.

Thomas would get latin-1 for binary interchange with mostly-ascii data

The HDF-5 folks would get utf-8 for binary interchange (If we can workout the null-padding issue)

Even folks that had weird JAVA or Windows-generated UTF-16 data files could do the binary interchange thing....

I'm now lost as to what the hang-up is.

-CHB

PS: null padding is a pain, python strings seem to preserve the zeros, whic is odd -- is thre a unicode code-point at x00?

But you can use it to strip properly with the unicode sandwich:

In [63]: ut16 = text.encode('utf-16') + b'\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00'

In [64]: ut16.decode('utf-16')
Out[64]: 'some text\x00\x00\x00'

In [65]: ut16.decode('utf-16').strip('\x00')
Out[65]: 'some text'

In [66]: ut16.decode('utf-16').strip('\x00').encode('utf-16')
Out[66]: b'\xff\xfes\x00o\x00m\x00e\x00 \x00t\x00e\x00x\x00t\x00'

-CHB

Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer

Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959   voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE   (206) 526-6329   fax
Seattle, WA 98115   (206) 526-6317   main reception

Chris.Barker@noaa.gov