Christopher Barker wrote:
On 1/30/2009 3:22 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Now what would be _really_ cool is a special array type that would represent a constant array without wasting memory.
Can't you do that with scary stride tricks? I think I remember some discussion of this a while back.
I think that's right, but at that point, what gain is that over using a regular constant and relying on numpy's broadcasting?