On 07/28/2010 05:45 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:17:27 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote: [clip]
I put a new repostory (same location)
Some more notes:
1.1.x branch is missing.
This is maybe because in SVN something ugly was done with this branch?
No, that's because I made a mistake the rule file...
Something is still funny with some of the tags
$ (for tag in `git tag`; do V=`git log --oneline $tag \ |head -n200|wc -l`; echo "$V $tag"; done)| sort -n 2 v1.1.0 2 v1.1.1 2 v1.1.1rc1 2 v1.1.1rc2 3 v1.0b1 200 v0_2_0 200 v0_2_2 ...
That's exactly the problem with converting svn "tags" to real tags - there is no reason that the tag corresponds to something in a branch with the way svn works. But here the issue is a mistake one my end. We have a small enough number of tags so that we can check them by hand here.
I am updating the repo as we speak,
David