On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 16:49, Zachary Pincus <zachary.pincus@yale.edu> wrote:
But why not have the user just pass in the relevant optObject from the pyOpt namespace (or some restricted namespace that just has the relevant functions exposed)? E.g. my_analysis.perform(optimizer=pyOpt.Amoeba) rather than my_analysis.perform(optimizer='Amoeba')
+11ty-billion
This lets users do introspection on the pyOpt namespace to see what functions they can choose from, which is rather friendlier in an interactive environment.
Or implement their own without having to modify pyOpt. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco